Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application

Objective Interpretation of epidemiological studies on health effects from mobile phone use is hindered by uncertainties in the exposure assessment. We used a newly developed smartphone application (app) to validate self-reported mobile phone use and behaviour among adults. Methods 107 participants (mean age 41.4 years) in the Netherlands either downloaded the software app on their smartphone or were provided with a study smartphone for 4 weeks. The app recorded the number and duration of calls, text messages, data transfer, laterality and hands-free use. Self-reported mobile phone use was collected before using the app and after 6 months through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Results The geometric mean ratios (GMR, 95% CI) and Spearman correlations (r) of self-reported (after 6 months) versus recorded number and duration of calls were: GMR=0.65 (0.53 to 0.80), r=0.53; and GMR=1.11 (0.86 to 1.42), r=0.57 respectively. Participants held the phone on average for 86% of the total call time near the head. Self-reported right side users held the phone for 70.7% of the total call time on the right side of the head, and left side users for 66.2% on the left side of the head. The percentage of total call time that the use of hands-free devices (headset, speaker mode, Bluetooth) was recorded increased with increasing frequency of reported hands-free device usage. Discussion The observed recall errors and precision of reported laterality and hands-free use can be used to quantify and improve radiofrequency exposure models based on self-reported mobile phone use.

[1]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  The MOBI-Kids Study Protocol: Challenges in Assessing Childhood and Adolescent Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Wireless Telecommunication Technologies and Possible Association with Brain Tumor Risk , 2014, Front. Public Health.

[2]  Kari Tokola,et al.  Epidemiological risk assessment of mobile phones and cancer: where can we improve? , 2006, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[3]  J. Morrissey Radio frequency exposure in mobile phone users: implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[5]  Geza Benke,et al.  Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: Implications for exposure assessment , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[6]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Validation of self-reported cellular phone use , 2004, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[7]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  S J Hepworth,et al.  Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Using software‐modified smartphones to validate self‐reported mobile phone use in young people: A pilot study , 2015, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  Kirsten Frederiksen,et al.  Estimating associations of mobile phone use and brain tumours taking into account laterality: a comparison and theoretical evaluation of applied methods , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Rory Wolfe,et al.  A new method to determine laterality of mobile telephone use in adolescents , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[13]  E Cardis,et al.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[14]  Tore Tynes,et al.  Impact of random and systematic recall errors and selection bias in case–control studies on mobile phone use and brain tumors in adolescents (CEFALO study) , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  N. Brown,et al.  Forward telescoping: the question matters. , 1998, Memory.