FORTY YEARS OF FOREST SUCCESSION IN CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND

The first 40 yr of forest succession on permanent plots at the Harvard Forest in central New England followed the initial floristic composition model of forest succession. After the 1938 hurricane removed the previous white pine (Pinus strobus) canopy, species regenerated within 4-6 yr by sprouts, buried seed, and wind-blown seed, with no method of regeneration uniformly contrib- uting more to species success than another. Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) was the only species suc- cessfully regenerating after 1948. Pin cherry (Prunus pennsylvanica) was the early dominant in size and numbers (5000 stems/ha). At year 10, pin cherry, red maple (Acer rubrum), white ash (Fraxinus americana), and red oak (Quercus rubra) were dominant. Species diversity had reached a maximum. By year 40, red oak and paper birch (Betula papyrifera) showed strong canopy dominance, making up only 7.5 and 4.9W, respectively, of total density but 37.5 and 12.5%, respectively, of the size- dominant stems. Red maple and white pine were also codominant in 1978. Some evidence for an intermediate stage dominated by red maple and gray birch (B. populifolia) was found. On one pre- viously hardwood plot, the same species were present, and similar trends in species composition and dominance were followed, but there was more surviving hemlock advance regeneration and a lower density of some shade-intolerant early dominant species. The canopy structure was loosely multilay- ered, and at any given point in succession, species tended to be found in characteristic layers, although these relative positions could change with time.

[1]  P. E. Waggoner,et al.  A half century of natural transitions in mixed hardwood forests. , 1980 .

[2]  V. M. Conway,et al.  Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America. , 1951 .

[3]  John M. Crowley,et al.  Küchler, A.Q. Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States. American Geographical Society Special Pub. No. 36. New York, American Geographical Society, 1964. Carte accompagnée d’un manuel : illustrations, bibliographie. , 1964 .

[4]  T. W. Daniel,et al.  The Practice of Silviculture , 1936 .

[5]  E. Odum Organic Production and Turnover in Old Field Succession , 1960 .

[6]  N. Christensen Changes in Structure, Pattern and Diversity Associated with Climax Forest Maturation in Piedmont, North Carolina , 1977 .

[7]  S. Spurr,et al.  The virgin upland forest of central New England , 1942 .

[8]  J. Franklin,et al.  Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. , 1981 .

[9]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Succession: An Evolutionary Interpretation , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[10]  F. Stearns Ninety Years Change in a Northern Hardwood Forest in Wisconsin , 1949 .

[11]  Catherine Keever,et al.  Causes of Succession on Old Fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina , 1950 .

[12]  Thomas G. Siccama,et al.  Presettlement and Present Forest Vegetation in Northern Vermont with Special Reference to Chittenden County , 1971 .

[13]  J. Henry,et al.  RECONSTRUCTING FOREST HISTORY FROM LIVE AND DEAD PLANT MATERIAL AN APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF FOREST SUCCESSION IN SOUTHWEST NEW HAMPSHIRE , 1974 .

[14]  O. Loucks,et al.  Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. , 1970, American zoologist.

[15]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[16]  R. L. Crocker,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT IN RELATION TO VEGETATION AND SURFACE AGE AT GLACIER BAY, ALASKA* , 1955 .

[17]  S. Spurr Natural Restocking of Forests Following the 1938 Hurricane in Central New England , 1956 .

[18]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[19]  W. Leak Successional Change in Northern Hardwoods Predicted by Birth and Death Simulation , 1970 .

[20]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[21]  T. S. Elias The complete trees of North America : field guide and natural history , 1981 .

[22]  Henry Chandler Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[23]  H. M. Raup The View From John Sanderson's Farm: A Perspective for the Use of the Land , 1966, Forest History Newsletter.

[24]  Henry J. Oosting,et al.  An Ecological Analysis of the Plant Communities of Piedmont, North Carolina , 1942 .

[25]  P. Marks,et al.  THE ROLE OF PIN CHERRY (PRUNUS PENSYLVANICA L.) IN THE MAINTENANCE OF STABILITY IN NORTHERN , 1974 .

[26]  Leslie A. Viereck,et al.  Plant Succession and Soil Development on Gravel Outwash of the Muldrow Glacier, Alaska , 1966 .

[27]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[28]  P. Waggoner,et al.  Transition Probabilities for a Forest , 1970, Nature.

[29]  W. Cooper,et al.  A Fourth Expedition to Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1939 .

[30]  C. Oliver Even-Aged Development of Mixed-Species Stands , 1980 .

[31]  Chadwick Dearing Oliver,et al.  Reconstruction of a Mixed‐Species Forest in Central New England , 1977 .

[32]  D. M. Ludlum Early American Hurricanes 1492-1870 , 1963 .

[33]  C. Oliver Forest development in North America following major disturbances , 1980 .

[34]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[35]  C. Oliver The Development Of Northern Red Oak In Mixed Stands In Central New England , 1978 .

[36]  G. Likens,et al.  Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. , 1979 .

[37]  W. Reiners,et al.  Plant Diversity in a Chronosequence at Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1971 .

[38]  A. C. Cline,et al.  Mixed white pine and hardwood , 1925 .

[39]  Norman L. Christensen,et al.  Secondary Forest Succession on the North Carolina Piedmont , 1981 .

[40]  D. Hibbs White pine in the transition hardwood forest , 1982 .