Patent analysis for technology development of artificial intelligence: A country-level comparative study

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a key role in knowledge economies, because it can be used to develop systems that think like humans, act like humans, think rationally, and act rationally (Russell & Norvig, 2010). In this study, we divide AI into four sub-technological fields: Problem reasoning and solving, machine learning, network structures, and knowledge processing systems. This study investigates three main issues related to the technology development of AI. First, the aggregate technology development of AI is examined, and the four sub-technological fields of AI are compared. Second, we employ measures of patent quantity and patent quality to demonstrate the technology development of AI in different countries. Finally, we investigate the technology positions of different countries in the four sub-technological fields of AI. By analyzing a patent and citation dataset comprised of all patents granted by the United States patent and trademark office from 1976 to 2010, we obtain empirical findings that help us understand the technology development of AI in different countries. The major contributions of this study are four measures of patent quantity (PCA, PCI, SHAI, and SHIA) and three measures of patent quality (citation ratios, CII, and TCT). These measures are helpful in understanding technological development of AI in different counties. Moreover, we use patent citation data and investigate the technology flow in AI, in order to determine the technology position of different countries in the four sub-technological fields of AI.

[1]  L WaltzDavid Evolution, Sociobiology, and the Future of Artificial Intelligence , 2006 .

[2]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[3]  Chun-Yao Tseng,et al.  Technology development and knowledge spillover in Africa: evidence using patent and citation data , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Javier Alfonso-Gil,et al.  Innovation processes in mature clusters of SMEs. A proposal for assessment indicators , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[5]  Timothy R. Anderson,et al.  Using technological intelligence for strategic decision making in high technology environments , 2011 .

[6]  H. Grupp,et al.  Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation , 1999 .

[7]  David J. Teece,et al.  Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation , 2004 .

[8]  B. V. P. D. L. Potterie,et al.  The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data , 2001 .

[9]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB , 2010 .

[10]  Chun-Yao Tseng,et al.  Innovation quality in the automobile industry: measurement indicators and performance implications , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[11]  David L. Waltz Evolution, Sociobiology, and the Future of Artificial Intelligence , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  Timothy Schoenecker,et al.  Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[13]  A. Spithoven,et al.  Beyond borders : internationalisation of R&D and policy implications for small open economies , 2005 .

[14]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Patents, Real Options and Firm Performance , 2002 .

[15]  Megan MacGarvie,et al.  The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations , 2005 .

[16]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[17]  Lee Spector,et al.  Evolution of artificial intelligence , 2006, Artif. Intell..