Large field of view quantitative phase imaging of induced pluripotent stem cells and optical pathlength reference materials

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are reprogrammed cells that can have heterogeneous biological potential. Quality assurance metrics of reprogrammed iPSCs will be critical to ensure reliable use in cell therapies and personalized diagnostic tests. We present a quantitative phase imaging (QPI) workflow which includes acquisition, processing, and stitching multiple adjacent image tiles across a large field of view (LFOV) of a culture vessel. Low magnification image tiles (10x) were acquired with a Phasics SID4BIO camera on a Zeiss microscope. iPSC cultures were maintained using a custom stage incubator on an automated stage. We implement an image acquisition strategy that compensates for non-flat illumination wavefronts to enable imaging of an entire well plate, including the meniscus region normally obscured in Zernike phase contrast imaging. Polynomial fitting and background mode correction was implemented to enable comparability and stitching between multiple tiles. LFOV imaging of reference materials indicated that image acquisition and processing strategies did not affect quantitative phase measurements across the LFOV. Analysis of iPSC colony images demonstrated mass doubling time was significantly different than area doubling time. These measurements were benchmarked with prototype microsphere beads and etched-glass gratings with specified spatial dimensions designed to be QPI reference materials with optical pathlength shifts suitable for cell microscopy. This QPI workflow and the use of reference materials can provide non-destructive traceable imaging method for novel iPSC heterogeneity characterization.

[1]  Masafumi Okumura,et al.  Heterogeneity of pluripotent marker gene expression in colonies generated in human iPS cell induction culture. , 2008, Stem cell research.

[2]  G. Daley,et al.  Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Henry Pinkard,et al.  Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. , 2014, Journal of biological methods.

[4]  B. Wattellier,et al.  Quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry for quantitative phase microscopy of living cells. , 2009, Optics express.

[5]  M. Teitell,et al.  Live-cell mass profiling: an emerging approach in quantitative biophysics , 2014, Nature Methods.

[6]  Dean C Ripple,et al.  The Use of Index-Matched Beads in Optical Particle Counters , 2014, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[7]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Quantitative Phase Imaging , 2012 .

[8]  P Bajcsy,et al.  Empirical gradient threshold technique for automated segmentation across image modalities and cell lines , 2015, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  John T Elliott,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance microscopy: Achieving a quantitative optical response. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[10]  R. Barer,et al.  Refractometry of Living Cells: Part II. The Immersion Medium , 1955 .

[11]  Joe Chalfoun,et al.  MIST: Accurate and Scalable Microscopy Image Stitching Tool with Stage Modeling and Error Minimization , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  J. Marrison,et al.  Ptychography – a label free, high-contrast imaging technique for live cells using quantitative phase information , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[13]  R. Barer,et al.  Refractometry of living cells. , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte,et al.  A High Proliferation Rate Is Required for Cell Reprogramming and Maintenance of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Identity , 2011, Current Biology.