Manual takeover after highly automated driving: Influence of budget time and Lane Change Assist on takeover performance

The current study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of additional assistance system to support driver performance during a takeover request in a conditionally automated vehicle, that is, Level 3 of SAE taxonomy. Seventy drivers participated in the simulator carried on a driving simulator (62 drivers retained). The takeover request issued due to another vehicle blocking the way obliged the participant to take over and change lane. Two versions of a Lane Change Assist (LCA) were tested across two groups with short (4 sec) and long (8 sec) time budget for a takeover. We observed that when provided longer takeover time budget, higher number of drivers completed the lane change maneuver successfully, adopted different takeover strategy, and had fewer accidents. We did not observe an effect of the presence or the type of LCA on takeover performance. However, a comparison of incident-free takeovers with those with a lateral collision revealed that the presence of LCA was associated with higher number of incident-free takeovers in the 8-sec group. Overall, drivers could benefit from additional assistance systems during takeover, especially when they are provided enough time to process information and act upon it.

[1]  Renaud Deborne,et al.  Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement , 2017 .

[2]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? , 2013 .

[3]  Fouad Hadj-Selem,et al.  How different mental workload levels affect the take-over control after automated driving , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[4]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  The design of a vibrotactile seat for conveying take-over requests in automated driving , 2017 .

[5]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[6]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving , 2014 .

[7]  Anne Guillaume,et al.  Effects of non-driving-related tasks on takeover performance in different takeover situations in conditionally automated driving , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[8]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[9]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Ubernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Autofahren , 2012 .