Trials, Errors, and Improvements in Coproduction of Climate Services

AbstractClimate change yields both challenges and opportunities. In both cases, costly adaptations and transformations are necessary and desirable, and these must be based on realistic and relevant...

[1]  Carlo Aall,et al.  The regional level as boundary organization? An analysis of climate change adaptation governance in Norway , 2015 .

[2]  Gary Hickey,et al.  Co-production from proposal to paper , 2018, Nature.

[3]  S. Meijerink,et al.  What Kind of Leadership Do We Need for Climate Adaptation? A Framework for Analyzing Leadership Objectives, Functions, and Tasks in Climate Change Adaptation , 2013 .

[4]  E. McNie.  Delivering Climate Services: Organizational Strategies and Approaches for Producing Useful Climate-Science Information , 2012 .

[5]  Deborah Lawrence,et al.  Hydrological projections for floods in Norway under a future climate , 2011 .

[6]  Y. Steinert,et al.  Twelve tips for conducting effective workshops. , 1992, Medical teacher.

[7]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Improving the use of climate information in decision-making , 2017 .

[8]  S. Sobolowski,et al.  Improving the Reliability and Added Value of Dynamical Downscaling via Correction of Large‐Scale Errors: A Norwegian Perspective , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[9]  Erik W. Kolstad,et al.  Downscaling an intense precipitation event in complex terrain: the importance of high grid resolution , 2017 .

[10]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[11]  Megan Scudellari,et al.  How three research groups are tearing down the ivory tower , 2018, Nature.

[12]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge , 2011 .

[13]  C. Wamsler.  Stakeholder involvement in strategic adaptation planning: Transdisciplinarity and co-production at stake? , 2017 .

[14]  A. Stohl,et al.  Remote sources of water vapor forming precipitation on the Norwegian west coast at 60°N–a tale of hurricanes and an atmospheric river , 2008 .

[15]  E. Ostrom.  Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .

[16]  Daniel Sarewitz,et al.  Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research , 2016 .

[17]  Matthias Kaiser,et al.  Co-producing “Post-normal” Climate Knowledge with Communities in Northeast Bangladesh , 2018 .

[18]  Antonio Miceli,et al.  The best is the enemy of the good. , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  David W. Cash,et al.  Making short-term climate forecasts useful: Linking science and action , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  W. Clark,et al.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Kaja Pogačar,et al.  Urban Hackathon - Alternative Information Based and Participatory Approach to Urban Development , 2016 .

[23]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[24]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[25]  F. Berkes,et al.  Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity , 2009 .

[26]  Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al.  Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .

[27]  Guy P. Brasseur,et al.  Climate services: Lessons learned and future prospects: CLIMATE SERVICES , 2016 .

[28]  S. Dessai,et al.  Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science , 2013 .

[29]  Grete K. Hovelsrud,et al.  Driving the Agenda for Climate Change Adaptation in Norwegian Municipalities , 2013 .

[30]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[31]  Hege Westskog,et al.  How to Make Local Context Matter in National Advice: Towards Adaptive Comanagement in Norwegian Climate Adaptation , 2017 .

[32]  L. Dilling,et al.  Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy , 2011 .

[33]  Ole Einar Tveito,et al.  Temperature and precipitation scenarios for Norway: comparison of results from dynamical and empirical downscaling , 2003 .

[34]  R. Moss,et al.  To co-produce or not to co-produce , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[35]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Scott E. Kalafatis,et al.  Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making , 2015 .

[37]  E. McNie.  Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[38]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Mini-me: Why do climate scientists’ misunderstand users and their needs? , 2017 .

[39]  S. Healy,et al.  Extended peer communities and the ascendance of post-normal politics , 1999 .

[40]  Richard B. Rood,et al.  Moving Climate Information off the Shelf: Boundary Chains and the Role of RISAs as Adaptive Organizations , 2014 .

[41]  S. Bremer,et al.  Co‐production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives , 2017 .