Why the EU ETS needs reforming: an empirical analysis of the impact on company investments

The European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is so far the largest emissions trading system in the world. A rigorous ex post empirical analysis of the scheme is presented. The effect of the scheme on firms' investment decisions in carbon-reducing technologies is analysed by using detailed firm-level data from Swedish industry. Based on difference-in-difference estimation as well as a before–after difference estimation, the results reveal that the EU ETS has not had a significant effect on firms’ decisions to invest in carbon-mitigating technologies. However, although the EU ETS appears to have no direct effect on investments, it is too early to dismiss the system. Consideration is given to how the EU ETS can realize its potential to become an effective tool in the EU climate and energy policy portfolio.

[1]  A. Ellerman,et al.  Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU Ets Based on the 2005 Emissions Data , 2006 .

[2]  Lars Zetterberg,et al.  What Have We Learnt from the European Union’s Emissions Trading System? , 2012, AMBIO.

[3]  Henrik Hammar,et al.  Explaining adoption of end of pipe solutions and clean technologies--Determinants of firms' investments for reducing emissions to air in four sectors in Sweden , 2007 .

[4]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC , 2005 .

[5]  Céline Nauges,et al.  Ex Post Evaluation of an Earmarked Tax on Air Pollution , 2006, Land Economics.

[6]  C. Hepburn,et al.  The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices , 2006 .

[7]  Scott Milliman,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Reply , 1992 .

[8]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: a survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector , 2012 .

[9]  A. Marin,et al.  Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control: Comment☆ , 1991 .

[10]  René Kemp,et al.  The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? , 2011 .

[11]  M. Frondel,et al.  End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries , 2007 .

[12]  R. Lamming,et al.  THE ROLE OF SUPPLY MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES IN GREEN SUPPLY , 2001 .

[13]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[14]  P. González.  Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: a study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry , 2005 .

[15]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  A Symmetric Safety Valve , 2009 .

[16]  Raymond J. Kopp,et al.  Technology Adoption and Aggregate Energy Efficiency , 2002 .

[17]  Leigh J. Maynard,et al.  Determinants of Cleaner Technology Investments in the U.S. Bleached Kraft Pulp Industry , 2001, Land Economics.

[18]  S. de Bruyn,et al.  Impacts on competitiveness from EU ETS : An analysis of the Dutch industry , 2008 .

[19]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[20]  R. McDonald,et al.  The Value of Waiting to Invest , 1982 .

[21]  Uwe Jirjahn,et al.  Works Councils and Environmental Investment: Theory and Evidence from German Panel Data , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Peter Cramton,et al.  Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather , 2002 .

[23]  Winston Harrington,et al.  On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates , 2000 .

[24]  A. Ellerman,et al.  The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results , 2007, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[25]  Economic Instruments of Environmental Policy , 1995 .

[26]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  An Experimental Study of Auctions Versus Grandfathering to Assign Pollution Permits , 2009 .

[27]  Malte Schneider,et al.  The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector , 2011 .

[28]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  EU ETS and Investment Decisions:: The Case of the German Electricity Industry , 2007 .

[29]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007 , 2008 .

[30]  David A. Malueg.  Emission credit trading and the incentive to adopt new pollution abatement technology , 1989 .

[31]  Swedish Environmental.  Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol , 2010 .

[32]  A. Ellerman,et al.  Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme , 2007 .

[33]  S. Brammer,et al.  "Green" supply chain management: The role of trust and top management in B2B and B2C markets , 2012 .

[34]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Policy-Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown , 2001 .

[35]  R. Newell,et al.  Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits , 2004 .