Effect of flow velocity, substrate concentration and hydraulic cleaning on biofouling of reverse osmosis feed channels

Abstract A two-dimensional mathematical model coupling fluid dynamics, salt and substrate transport and biofilm development in time was used to investigate the effects of cross-flow velocity and substrate availability on biofouling in reverse osmosis (RO)/nanofiltration (NF) feed channels. Simulations performed in channels with or without spacer filaments describe how higher liquid velocities lead to less overall biomass amount in the channel by increasing the shear stress. In all studied cases at constant feed flow rate, biomass accumulation in the channel reached a steady state. Replicate simulation runs prove that the stochastic biomass attachment model does not affect the stationary biomass level achieved and has only a slight influence on the dynamics of biomass accumulation. Biofilm removal strategies based on velocity variations are evaluated. Numerical results indicate that sudden velocity increase could lead to biomass sloughing, followed however by biomass re-growth when returning to initial operating conditions. Simulations show particularities of substrate availability in membrane devices used for water treatment, e.g., the accumulation of rejected substrates at the membrane surface due to concentration polarization. Interestingly, with an increased biofilm thickness, the overall substrate consumption rate dominates over accumulation due to substrate concentration polarization, eventually leading to decreased substrate concentrations in the biofilm compared to bulk liquid.

[1]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Implications of critical flux and cake enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP) on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis: Experimental observations , 2008 .

[2]  T. Pintelon,et al.  Validation of 3D simulations of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of biofouling and fluid dynamics in feed spacer channels of membrane devices , 2009 .

[4]  Eberhard Morgenroth,et al.  Simulation of growth and detachment in biofilm systems under defined hydrodynamic conditions. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  D. Hempel,et al.  Behaviour of biofilm systems under varying hydrodynamic conditions. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Stephan Scholl,et al.  Structure and shear strength of microbial biofilms as determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy and fluid dynamic gauging using a novel rotating disc biofilm reactor , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem. , 2009, Water research.

[10]  F. Volke,et al.  Investigation of biofilm structure, flow patterns and detachment with magnetic resonance imaging , 2005 .

[11]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems. , 2010, Water research.

[12]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Relation between the structure of an aerobic biofilm and transport phenomena , 1995 .

[13]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. , 2009, Water research.

[14]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Biofouling in spiral wound membrane systems: Three-dimensional CFD model based evaluation of experimental data , 2010 .

[15]  P. Stewart,et al.  A three‐dimensional computer model analysis of three hypothetical biofilm detachment mechanisms , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  H. Flemming,et al.  Biofouling in water systems – cases, causes and countermeasures , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  Ravindra Duddu,et al.  A two‐dimensional continuum model of biofilm growth incorporating fluid flow and shear stress based detachment , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical study on the correlation of spatial structure, hydrodynamic conditions, and mass transfer and conversion in biofilms , 2000 .

[19]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Simulation of the Flow around Spacer Filaments between Channel Walls. 2. Mass-Transfer Enhancement , 2002 .

[20]  L. Lijklema,et al.  Light adaptation of Oscillatoria Agardhii at different time scales. , 1995 .

[21]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Use of particle imaging velocimetry to measure liquid velocity profiles in liquid and liquid/gas flows through spacer filled channels , 2010 .

[22]  S. Altobelli,et al.  NMR and Microelectrode Studies of Hydrodynamics and Kinetics in Biofilms , 1993 .

[23]  H. Flemming,et al.  The permeability of biofouling layers on membranes , 1994 .

[24]  Raquel Salcedo-Díaz,et al.  Experimental study of concentration polarization in a crossflow reverse osmosis system using Digital Holographic Interferometry , 2010 .

[25]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure , 2007 .

[26]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[27]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  C. Picioreanu,et al.  Influence of biomass production and detachment forces on biofilm structures in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[29]  H. Brinkman.  A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles , 1949 .

[30]  Hilary M. Lappin-Scott,et al.  Evolving perspectives of biofilm structure , 1999 .

[31]  Z. Lewandowski,et al.  Reproducibility of biofilm processes and the meaning of steady state in biofilm reactors. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Numerical study of concentration polarization in a rectangular reverse osmosis membrane channel: Permeate flux variation and hydrodynamic end effects , 2007 .

[33]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Particle-Based Multidimensional Multispecies Biofilm Model , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Modeling the effect of biofilm formation on reverse osmosis performance: Flux, feed channel pressure drop and solute passage , 2010 .

[35]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: Role of concentration polarisation and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure phenomena , 2008 .

[36]  Z Lewandowski,et al.  Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[37]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  A general description of detachment for multidimensional modelling of biofilms. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  A modelling study of the activity and structure of biofilms in biological reactors , 2004 .