The impact of time delay on the content of discussions at a computer-mediated ergonomics conference

This study investigates the relationship between the content of computer-mediated discussions and the time delay between online postings. The study aims to broaden understanding of the dynamics of computer-mediated discussion regarding the time delay and the actual content of computer-mediated discussions (Knowledge construction, Social aspects, Number of words, and Number of postings). A sample drawn from the computer-mediated discussions of the CybErg 2005 virtual ergonomics conference served as the data for this study. The Interaction Analysis Model was utilised to analyse the level of knowledge construction in the content of the computer-mediated discussions. The correlation results demonstrate that Knowledge construction, Social aspects and Number of words generated within postings were independent of, and not affected by, the Time delay between the postings and the postings from which the replies were formulated. When greater numbers of words were utilised within postings, this was typically associated with a greater level of knowledge construction. Social aspects in the discussion were found to neither advantage nor disadvantage the overall effectiveness of the computer-mediated discussion.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Analyzing patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students ' online science discussion , 2004 .

[3]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  KieslerSara,et al.  Reducing Social Context Cues , 1986 .

[5]  Willard McCarty,et al.  HUMANIST: Lessons from a Global Electronic Seminar , 1992, Comput. Humanit..

[6]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols , 2004 .

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[8]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  Evaluation of Discussions in Online Classrooms , 2003, KES.

[9]  Mark Pendergast.  An analysis tool for the assessment of student participation and implementation dynamics in online discussion forums , 2006, SITE.

[10]  Barrie Jo Price,et al.  Computer Mediated Collaboration , 2008, Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication.

[11]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Online professional development for teachers , 2004 .

[12]  P. W. Conner.  Networking in the humanities: Lessons from ANSAXNET , 1992 .

[13]  Matthew Hurst,et al.  Deriving marketing intelligence from online discussion , 2005, KDD '05.

[14]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[15]  Chih-Hsiung Tu,et al.  The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence , 2002 .

[16]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Book Reviews : Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the Future , 1984 .

[17]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[18]  G. Salomon,et al.  4 No distribution without individuals ' cognition : a dynamic interactional view GAVRIEL SALOMON 5 Living knowledge : the social distribution of cultural resources for thinking , 2022 .

[19]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online communities: a longitudinal analysis of communication activities , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[20]  Frances Cairncross.  The death of distance : how the communications revolution will change our lives , 1997 .

[21]  Fei Ching Chen,et al.  Effective discussions, social talks and learning: a paradox on learning in discussion forums , 2005, CSCL.

[22]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Computer-Mediated Scholarly Collaboration , 1990 .

[23]  T. Baumgartner.  Reading Statistics and Research (5th ed.) , 2008 .

[24]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  Uwe Matzat,et al.  Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts? , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[26]  Linda Shields,et al.  Content Analysis , 2015 .

[27]  S. R. Hiltz.  Online communities , 1983 .

[28]  Judith B. Pena-Shaff,et al.  An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing Student Interactions in Computer-Mediated Communication Environments , 2001 .

[29]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Do Public Electronic Bulletin Boards Help Create Scientific Knowledge? , 1995 .

[30]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[31]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[32]  M. Savic.  Book review: Reading Statistics and Research Schuyler W. Huck (Pearson Education Inc., Boston 2007) , 2008 .

[33]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Talking to strangers: an evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration , 1996, CSCW '96.

[34]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Argumentative Reasoning in Online Discussion , 2000 .

[35]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[36]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[37]  David Newman,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning in Computer Supported Co-Operative Learning , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[38]  Arthur N. Applebee.  Writing and Reasoning , 1984 .

[39]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Online Conferences for Professional Development , 2002 .

[40]  E. White.  Assessing Higher Order Thinking and Communication Skills in College Graduates through Writing. , 1991 .