User-Centered Design Approaches and Methods for P5 eHealth

As seen throughout this book, eHealth informed by P5 approach gives full recognition to patients’ contexts, needs, desires, and personal characteristics. These aspects should not only be considered as cornerstones for technology evaluation, but as fundamental guidelines for design in the first place. This relates to User-Centered Design, that is, any technology/service design where final users influence how the design itself takes place. In other words, eHealth development should be based on research data gathered among final users about their needs and contexts of use, in order to be specifically tailored on final users even before the realization of low-level prototypes. This methodological contribution presents a critical presentation, description, and evaluation of research tools to be employed not to evaluate technology’s results and effectiveness, but the specific characteristics of users in order to orient design and development. Such an approach should be considered the “gold standard” of P5 eHealth solutions.

[1]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[2]  Ilpo Koskinen,et al.  Co-experience: user experience as interaction , 2005 .

[3]  G. Riva,et al.  Being Present in Action: A Theoretical Model About the “Interlocking” Between Intentions and Environmental Affordances , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Hua Wang,et al.  From the Experience of Interactivity and Entertainment to Lower Intention to Smoke: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Path Analysis of a Web-Based Smoking Prevention Program for Adolescents , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[6]  Phil Turner,et al.  Designing Interactive Systems: People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies , 2005 .

[7]  J. Goguen An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design , 1999 .

[8]  R. E. Robinson Making Sense of Making Sense: Frameworks and Organizational Perception , 2010 .

[9]  G. Riva,et al.  Efficacy of a digital education program on Life Satisfaction and digital self efficacy in older adults: A mixed method study , 2016 .

[10]  Giuseppe Mantovani,et al.  Social Context in HCI: A New Framework for Mental Models, Cooperation, and Communication , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[12]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Response to Vera and Simon's Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Gabriella Pravettoni,et al.  P5 medicine: a plus for a personalized approach to oncology , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Jesse James Garrett The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web , 2002 .

[16]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  Establishing usability heuristics for heuristics evaluation in a specific domain: Is there a consensus? , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[18]  Ioanna Vekiri,et al.  Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  User interface directions for the Web , 1999, CACM.

[20]  N. Thomas,et al.  Recovery After Psychosis: Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Lived Experience Videos on a Recovery-Oriented Website , 2018, JMIR mental health.

[21]  Gi Woong Choi,et al.  Cultural dimensions for user experience: cross-country and cross-product analysis of users' cultural characteristics , 2008 .

[22]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognition in the Head and in the World: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Situated Action , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Richard W. Millard,et al.  Use of the Internet by Patients with Chronic Illness , 2002 .

[24]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Health Care Consumers: An Acceptance Model and Survey , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[26]  Rod Walsh,et al.  Cultural differences in smartphone user experience evaluation , 2010, MUM.

[27]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[28]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  eHealth research from the user's perspective. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Hedonomics: The Power of Positive and Pleasurable Ergonomics , 2005 .

[30]  Stefano Triberti,et al.  The quest for engaging AmI: Patient engagement and experience design tools to promote effective assisted living , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[31]  Elizabeth M. Borycki,et al.  Integrating Heuristic Evaluation with Cognitive Walkthrough: Development of a Hybrid Usability Inspection Method , 2015, ITCH.

[32]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Rune Fensli,et al.  End-to-End Infrastructure for Usability Evaluation of eHealth Applications and Services , 2014 .

[34]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  Katja Battarbee,et al.  Co-experience: the social user experience , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[36]  Gabriella Pravettoni,et al.  A P5 cancer medicine approach: why personalized medicine cannot ignore psychology. , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[37]  Jonathan Randall Howarth,et al.  Cultural similarities and differences in user-defined gestures for touchscreen user interfaces , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[38]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Enacting interactivity: The role of presence , 2008 .

[39]  J R Wilson,et al.  Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[40]  G. Pravettoni,et al.  Training Cognitive Functions Using Mobile Apps in Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[41]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .

[42]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[43]  Michael Schaefer,et al.  Effects of different viewing perspectives on somatosensory activations during observation of touch , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[44]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[45]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[46]  James Noble,et al.  A Semiotic Model of User-Interface Metaphor , 2004 .

[47]  G. Riva,et al.  Developing Emotional Design: Emotions as Cognitive Processes and their Role in the Design of Interactive Technologies , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[48]  Christoph Steinbeck,et al.  Bioinformatics Meets User-Centred Design: A Perspective , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  E. W. Gould,et al.  Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design , 2000, INTR.

[50]  E. Brivio,et al.  Nuove tecnologie e autoefficacia percepita: influenze del genere e delle modalità d'uso , 2010 .

[51]  Constance Johnson,et al.  Social Support for Diabetes Self-Management via eHealth Interventions , 2016, Current Diabetes Reports.

[52]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[53]  A. Malla,et al.  Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of an eHealth Intervention for Youth Receiving Services for First-Episode Psychosis: Adaptation Framework and Protocol for Horyzons-Canada Phase 1 , 2018, JMIR research protocols.

[54]  R. Nickerson Engineering Psychology and Ergonomics , 1999 .

[55]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  A review of Internet use among older adults , 2018, New Media Soc..

[56]  W. Peng,et al.  Keep Using My Health Apps: Discover Users' Perception of Health and Fitness Apps with the UTAUT2 Model. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[57]  Alan E. Benson,et al.  Are We Overlooking Some Usability Testing Methods? A Comparison of Lab, Beta, and Forum Tests , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[58]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Evaluation of a digital camera image applied to PCB inspection , 2008 .

[59]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[60]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[61]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[62]  Vincent Koenig,et al.  User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners' perspectives through an international survey , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[63]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality , 2008, IHM '08.

[64]  Andrea Gaggioli,et al.  Positive and Transformative Technologies for Active Ageing , 2016, MMVR.