The international competitiveness of China’s shipbuilding industry

This paper introduces profit rate as a more relevant measure of international shipbuilding competitiveness. We also develop a model to identify competitiveness factors and their relative importance. Our findings suggest that Chinese competitiveness derives from shipbuilding costs, whereas contract price deviations are the driver for Japan and South Korea. We argue that China became more competitive in building of bulk carriers and tankers than Japan and to a lesser extent than South Korea after year 2000 and that a market trough would further strengthen China’s competitiveness. Our results have broad implications for monitoring industrial performance and formulating competitive strategies for shipyards.

[1]  Floriano C. M. Pires.  AN ASSESSMENT OF BRAZILIAN SHIPBUILDING COMPETITIVE POTENTIAL , 1999 .

[2]  Tong-sŏng Cho,et al.  Shipbuilding industry : Trends, characteristics, and global competition , 1984 .

[3]  M R Kattan,et al.  SHIPBUILDING COMPETITIVENESS: THE MARKETING OVERVIEW. , 1997 .

[4]  João Carlos Ferraz.  Determinants and consequences of rapid growth in the Brazilian shipbuilding industry , 1986 .

[6]  William K. Carter,et al.  Cost accounting; planning and control , 1972 .

[7]  A. W. Carmichael.  Practical Ship Production , 2009 .

[8]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[9]  Paul W Scott.  Marketing Strategy for Merchant Shipbuilders , 1995 .

[10]  Alexander C. Landsburg,et al.  Analysis of Japanese and Korean shipbuilding prices , 1988 .

[11]  D. Glen.  Shipbuilding disputes: the WTO panel rulings and the elimination of operating subsidy from shipbuilding , 2006 .

[12]  Daniel Todd.  Industrial Dislocation: The Case of Global Shipbuilding , 1991 .

[13]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[14]  Peter N. Davies,et al.  Reviews of Tomohei Chida and Peter N. Davies, The Japanese Shipping and Shipbuilding Industries. A History of their Modern Growth , 1990 .

[15]  D. Todd.  The World Shipbuilding Industry , 1985 .

[16]  W. Diebold,et al.  Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1990 .

[17]  V Bertram.  Strategic control of productivity and other competitiveness parameters , 2003 .

[18]  Michael Goldan.  The National Shipbuilding Research Program. 1995 Ship Production Symposium. Paper No. 15: The Netherlands' Shipbuilding Industry: Own Solutions to Competitiveness , 1995 .

[19]  Sjoerd Hengst,et al.  ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVENESS IN COMMERCIAL SHIPBUILDING.. , 1996 .

[20]  Emerson C Colin,et al.  Benchmarking shipbuilders' turnover of main assets , 2009 .

[21]  Thomas Lamb,et al.  Shipbuilding performance benchmarking , 2009 .

[22]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  Core competence and competitive strategy of the Taiwan shipbuilding industry: a resource-based approach , 2004 .

[23]  Stig Tenold,et al.  The Basis for South Korea's Ascent in the Shipbuilding Industry, 1970–1990 , 2011 .

[24]  Thomas Lamb,et al.  Establishing performance targets for shipbuilding policies , 2008 .