Multispectral Co-Occurrence With Three Random Variables in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Cancer

Presented is a new computer-aided multispectral image processing method which is used in three spatial dimensions and one spectral dimension where the dynamic, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance parameter maps derived from voxel-wise model-fitting represent the spectral dimension. The method is based on co-occurrence analysis using a 3-D window of observation which introduces an automated identification of suspicious lesions. The co-occurrence analysis defines 21 different statistical features, a subset of which were input to a neural network classifier where the assessments of the voxel-wise majority of a group of radiologist readings were used as the gold standard. The voxel-wise true positive fraction (TPF) and false positive fraction (FPF) results of the computer classifier were statistically indistinguishable from the TPF and FPF results of the readers using a one sample paired t-test. In order to observe the generality of the method, two different groups of studies were used with widely different image acquisition specifications.

[1]  Lina Arbash Meinel,et al.  Breast MRI lesion classification: Improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer‐aided diagnosis (CAD) system , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Steffen Sammet,et al.  Improvement in the reproducibility of region of interest using an auditory feedback loop: A pilot assessment using dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) breast MR images , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Bradley D. Clymer,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameter based computer assisted diagnostic tool using three random variable co-occurrence approach , 2005, SIP.

[4]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Alan Jackson,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology , 2005 .

[6]  L R Schad,et al.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[8]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images1 , 2006 .

[9]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Inter‐ and intraobserver variability in the evaluation of dynamic breast cancer MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Tahsin Kurc,et al.  Malignant‐lesion segmentation using 4D co‐occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Tony Pan,et al.  Image processing for the grid: a toolkit for building grid-enabled image processing applications , 2003, CCGrid 2003. 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2003. Proceedings..

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[15]  M Thelen,et al.  Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[16]  Kayvan Najarian,et al.  Breast cancer detection in gadolinium‐enhanced MR images by static region descriptors and neural networks , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.