Rectal Augmentation and Stimulated Gracilis Anal Neosphincter: A New Approach in the Management of Fecal Urgency and Incontinence

PURPOSE The aim of this study was the development of a procedure which would successfully treat selected patients presenting with incapacitating urgency and fecal incontinence. Some patients presenting with urgency and fecal incontinence, with an intact anorectum but deficient sphincter mechanism, have low rectal compliance. Management is problematic, because correction of the sphincter defect does not abolish the incapacitating urgency caused by rectal hypersensitivity. METHODS This was a prospective study of three female patients with urgency and fecal incontinence who underwent combined rectal augmentation using a segment of distal ileum and stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter. All patients had low rectal volumes and two exhibited a temporal relationship between high-amplitude (>60 mmHg) rectal pressure waves and urgency on prolonged ambulatory anorectal manometry. RESULTS Urgency was abolished and continence restored in all individuals. When the level of stimulation was not optimal or had been discontinued, patients experienced only passive incontinence with no urgency. Postoperative physiology revealed elevated thresholds to rectal distention and a reduction in the number of high-amplitude rectal pressure waves in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Combined rectal augmentation with stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter may be of benefit to some patients with distressing urgency and fecal incontinence not previously helped by current techniques. Williams NS, Ogunbiyi OA, Scott SM, Fajobi O, Lunniss PJ. Rectal augmentation and stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter: a new approach in the management of fecal urgency and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:192–198.

[1]  M. Kamm,et al.  Gastrointestinal transit and prolonged ambulatory colonic motility in health and faecal incontinence , 1997, Gut.

[2]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[3]  B. Flourié,et al.  Motor activity recorded in the unprepared colon of healthy humans. , 1995, Gut.

[4]  W. Lewis,et al.  Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: Myth or reality? , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[5]  M. Henry,et al.  Effect of age, sex and parity on anorectal function , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  W. Lierse,et al.  Anal endosonography in healthy subjects and patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence , 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[7]  P. Czernichow,et al.  Relationship between clinical symptoms of anal incontinence and the results of anorectal manometry , 1992, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  N. Read,et al.  Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography, and sensation in determining the mechanism of 'idiopathic' faecal incontinence. , 1992, Gut.

[9]  N. S. Williams,et al.  The role and technique of ambulatory anal manometry. , 1992, Bailliere's clinical gastroenterology.

[10]  L. Boccon‐Gibod,et al.  Morphological and manometric study in the dog , 1992 .

[11]  N. Williams,et al.  Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter , 1991, The Lancet.

[12]  K. Kelly,et al.  The Rectal Motor Complex , 1989 .

[13]  D. Waldron,et al.  Prolonged manometric recording of anorectal motor activity in ambulant human subjects: evidence of periodic activity. , 1989, Gut.

[14]  M. Ghoneim,et al.  Urinary diversion to the augmented and valved rectum: preliminary results with a novel surgical procedure. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[15]  R. Kay,et al.  Augmentation cystoplasty. , 1986, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[16]  F. Lazorthes,et al.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo‐anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum , 1986, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  J. Morrison,et al.  New method for the dynamic assessment of anorectal function in constipation , 1985, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  M. Swash,et al.  Normal proximal and delayed distal conduction in the pudendal nerves of patients with idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  N. Read,et al.  A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. , 1979, Gastroenterology.

[20]  J. Lennard-jones,et al.  Sensibility of the rectum to distension and the anorectal distension reflex in ulcerative colitis. , 1978, Gut.