Open Science Graphs Must Interoperate!

Open Science Graphs (OSGs) are Scientific Knowledge Graphs whose intent is to improve the overall FAIRness of science, by enabling open access to graph representations of metadata about people, artefacts, institutions involved in the research lifecycle, as well as the relationships between these entities, in order to support stakeholder needs, such as discovery, reuse, reproducibility, statistics, trends, monitoring, impact, validation, and assessment. The represented information may span across entities such as research artefacts (e.g. publications, data, software, samples, instruments) and items of their content (e.g. statistical hypothesis tests reported in publications), research organisations, researchers, services, projects, and funders. OSGs include relationships between such entities and sometimes formalised (semantic) concepts characterising them, such as machine-readable concept descriptions for advanced discoverability, interoperability, and reuse. OSGs are generally valuable individually, but would greatly benefit from information exchange across their collections, thereby improving their efficacy to serve stakeholder needs. They could, therefore, reuse and exploit the data aggregation and added value that characterise each OSG, decentralising the effort and capitalising on synergies, as no one-size-fits-all solution exists. The RDA IG on Open Science Graphs for FAIR Data is investigating the motivation and challenges underpinning the realisation of an Interoperability Framework for OSGs. This work describes the key motivations for i) the definition of a classification for OSGs to compare their features, identify commonalities and differences, and added value and for ii) the definition of an Interoperability Framework, specifically an information model and APIs that enable a seamless exchange of information across graphs.

[1]  Sören Auer,et al.  Open Research Knowledge Graph: Next Generation Infrastructure for Semantic Scholarly Knowledge , 2019, K-CAP.

[2]  Marta Poblet,et al.  A Research Graph dataset for connecting research data repositories using RD-Switchboard , 2018, Scientific Data.

[3]  Amir Aryani,et al.  Research Graph: Building a Distributed Graph of Scholarly Works using Research Data Switchboard , 2017 .

[4]  David A. Pendlebury,et al.  Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[5]  Lesley Wyborn,et al.  Providing Research Graph Data in JSON-LD Using Schema.org , 2017, WWW.

[6]  Silvio Peroni,et al.  OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship , 2019, Quantitative Science Studies.

[7]  Lesley Wyborn,et al.  Graph Connections Made By RD-Switchboard Using NCI's Metadata , 2017, D Lib Mag..

[8]  Stacy Konkiel,et al.  Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[9]  Grégoire Côté,et al.  Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[10]  Pedro Príncipe,et al.  The OpenAIRE Research Graph Data Model , 2019 .

[11]  Paolo Manghi,et al.  The data-literature interlinking service: Towards a common infrastructure for sharing data-article links , 2017, Program.

[12]  Lily Troia The Scholix Framework for Interoperability in Data-Literature Information Exchange , 2017 .

[13]  Paolo Manghi,et al.  The Scholix Framework for Interoperability in Data-Literature Information Exchange , 2017, D Lib Mag..

[14]  Yuxiao Dong,et al.  Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[15]  Dominika Tkaczyk,et al.  Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[16]  Suzanne Fricke,et al.  Semantic Scholar , 2018, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.