Shaking Table Tests of a Novel Flat Slab-Flanged Wall (FSFW) Coupled System with Embedded Concrete-Filled-Steel-Tubes in Wall Piers

The flat slab-flanged wall (FSFW) coupled system has gained popularity in recent years; however, its seismic performance remains an issue, as beams and columns in it are commonly eliminated. To tackle this problem, embedding concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs) in wall piers has been proposed to strengthen the system; the viability of this approach has been verified at the member level. Along this line, this study embarks on a shaking table testing of a 1/8-scale five-story FSFW structure equipped with CFSTs in walls, with an aim to understand the overall seismic behavior of such an enhanced system. As with the practice in many countries, the plan layout of the test structure consisted of four rows of wall piers, thus presenting a ‘fish-bone’ floor configuration that relied only upon the walls to resist gravity and lateral loads. The structure was subjected to a suite of input ground motions along with white-noise excitations. By so doing, its damage progression, pattern and dynamic characteristics were clearly identified. Furthermore, a non-linear time history analysis was conducted using PERFORM-3D, and the goodness-of-fit of the computed responses to the experimental records was examined. Findings indicated that the application of CFSTs was instrumental in resisting the simulated earthquake loads acting on the FSFW system, hence the global response limits required by codes of practice were met, even in the case of extremely strong earthquakes. Nevertheless, the junction between the shear walls and floor slabs was found to be the weakest links in the whole system. Designers are thus cautioned to implement proper detailing in those regions to prevent local distress, though it did not appear to acutely impair the system’s collapse-resisting capacity.

[1]  Kutay Orakcal,et al.  Three-dimensional model for nonlinear analysis of slender flanged reinforced concrete walls , 2021 .

[2]  F. Pavel,et al.  Seismic performance assessment and rating for a flat-slab RC core wall structure in Bucharest, Romania , 2021 .

[3]  M. Hube,et al.  Seismic response of reinforced concrete wall buildings with nonlinear coupling slabs , 2021 .

[4]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Cyclic behavior of concrete‐encased high‐strength concrete‐filled steel tube composite walls: An experiment , 2020, Structural Concrete.

[5]  B. Shahrooz,et al.  Behavior of eccentrically loaded square spiral-confined high-strength concrete-filled steel tube columns , 2020 .

[6]  J. Reyes,et al.  A comparative study of seismic diaphragm design forces for RC dual system buildings , 2020, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[7]  P. Li,et al.  Seismic performance assessment of a precast concrete-encased CFST composite wall with twin steel tube connections , 2020 .

[8]  Vesna Terzic,et al.  Implications of modeling approaches on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise office and hospital shear wall buildings , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[9]  D. Ugalde,et al.  Assessment of the seismic capacity of tall wall buildings using nonlinear finite element modeling , 2019, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[10]  J. Vásquez,et al.  Comparative Study of State-of-the-Art Macroscopic Models for Planar Reinforced Concrete Walls , 2018, ACI Structural Journal.

[11]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Mechanical behavior of a steel tube-confined high-strength concrete shear wall under combined tensile and shear loading , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[12]  Xilin Lu,et al.  Shaking table tests and numerical analyses of an RC coupled wall structure with replaceable coupling beams , 2018 .

[13]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Cyclic testing and analysis of a full-scale cast-in-place reinforced concrete wall-slab-wall structure , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[14]  Aman Mwafy,et al.  Effect of vertical structural irregularity on seismic design of tall buildings , 2017 .

[15]  J. Wallace,et al.  Load – Deformation responses of slender structural steel reinforced concrete walls , 2017 .

[16]  Kypros Pilakoutas,et al.  A methodology for defining seismic scenario‐structure‐based limit state criteria for rc high‐rise wall buildings using net drift , 2017 .

[17]  J. Vásquez,et al.  Study of the damage of reinforced concrete shear walls during the 2010 Chile earthquake , 2016 .

[18]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  A statistical analysis of reinforced concrete wall buildings damaged during the 2010, Chile earthquake , 2015 .

[19]  Zhong Tao,et al.  Finite element modelling of concrete-filled steel stub columns under axial compression , 2013 .

[20]  Aman Mwafy,et al.  Analytically derived fragility relationships for the modern high‐rise buildings in the UAE , 2012 .

[21]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Seismic Design and Construction Practices for RC Structural Wall Buildings , 2012 .

[22]  S. Pujol,et al.  The Collapse of the Alto Río Building during the 27 February 2010 Maule, Chile, Earthquake , 2012 .

[23]  Thomas H.-K. Kang,et al.  Practical modelling of high‐rise dual systems with reinforced concrete slab‐column frames , 2009 .

[24]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Modelling issues for tall reinforced concrete core wall buildings , 2007 .

[25]  Wensheng Lu,et al.  Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center Tower , 2007 .

[26]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures , 2004 .

[27]  Jacob S. Grossman,et al.  Verification of Proposed Design Methodologies for Effective Width of Slabs in SlabColumn Frames , 1997 .

[28]  Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  Slab-Wall Connections Under Lateral Forces , 1992 .

[29]  R. G. Taylor,et al.  Slab Coupling of Earthquake-Resisting Shearwalls , 1981 .

[30]  Y. C. Wong,et al.  Interaction between floor slabs and shear walls in tall buildings , 1979 .

[31]  A. Coull,et al.  Effective Coupling of Shearwalls by Floor Slabs , 1975 .