Fault-Diagnosis Sensor Selection for Fuel Cell Stack Systems Combining an Analytic Hierarchy Process with the Technique Order Performance Similarity Ideal Solution Method

Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have rapidly developed and have been applied to many areas for decision making in engineering. Apart from that, the process to select fault-diagnosis sensor for Fuel Cell Stack system in various options is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue. However, in light of the choosing of fault diagnosis sensors, there is no MCDM analysis, and Fuel Cell Stack companies also urgently need a solution. Therefore, in this paper, we will use MCDM methods to analysis the fault-diagnosis sensor selection problem for the first time. The main contribution of this paper is to proposed a fault-diagnosis sensor selection methodology, which combines the rank reversal resisted AHP and TOPSIS and supports Fuel Cell Stack companies to select the optimal fault-diagnosis sensors. Apart from that, through the analysis, among all sensor alternatives, the acquisition of the optimal solution can be regarded as solving the symmetric or asymmetric problem of the optimal solution, which just maps to the TOPSIS method. Therefore, after apply the proposed fault-diagnosis sensor selection methodology, the Fuel Cell Stack system fault-diagnosis process will be more efficient, economical, and safe.

[1]  W. Sałabun,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Solar Panels with Determination of Local Significance Levels of Criteria Using the MCDM Methods Resistant to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon , 2021, Energies.

[2]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[3]  Philippe Girard,et al.  Selection of design project with the consideration of designers' satisfaction factors and collaboration ability , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management , 2016 .

[5]  Rajeev Kumar,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Based Symmetrical Model of Decision-Making for Estimating the Durability of Web Application , 2020, Symmetry.

[6]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Multiattribute Utility Theory (MAUT) , 2016 .

[7]  Alka Agrawal,et al.  Software Security Estimation Using the Hybrid Fuzzy ANP-TOPSIS Approach: Design Tactics Perspective , 2020, Symmetry.

[8]  Jean-Claude Vansnick On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach) , 1986 .

[9]  Guang-Ren Duan,et al.  Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for nonlinear satellite attitude control systems , 2014 .

[10]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  The Study of a Multicriteria Decision Making Model for Wave Power Plant Location Selection in Vietnam , 2019, Processes.

[11]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Are Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques Useful for Solving Corporate Finance Problems?: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2014 .

[12]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[13]  Jingyuan Zhang,et al.  An Improved Compact Genetic Algorithm for Scheduling Problems in a Flexible Flow Shop with a Multi-Queue Buffer , 2019 .

[14]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  M. A. Zulkifley,et al.  A review of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) system , 2017 .

[16]  Mesran,et al.  Technical Approach of TOPSIS in Decision Making , 2017 .

[17]  Nolberto Munier,et al.  A New Approach to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon in MCDM with the SIMUS Method , 2016 .

[18]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method , 2013 .

[19]  Steven T. Bushby,et al.  Assessing the performance of residential energy management control Algorithms: Multi-criteria decision making using the analytical hierarchy process , 2018 .

[20]  Serkan Yavuz,et al.  Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  Application of MCDM methods for flotation machine selection , 2019, Minerals Engineering.

[22]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[23]  F. J. Fernández,et al.  Energy study in water loop heat pump systems for office buildings in the Iberian Peninsula , 2017 .

[24]  F. J. Fernandez,et al.  The impact of hot metal temperature on CO2 emissions from basic oxygen converter , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[25]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Best-Worst method and Hamacher aggregation operations for intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic sets , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection , 2018, Omega.

[27]  A. Tuş Işık,et al.  UTA Method for the Consulting Firm Selection Problem , 2016 .

[28]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Machine Tool Alternatives , 2006, J. Intell. Manuf..

[29]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Control-Oriented Modeling and Analysis for Automotive Fuel Cell Systems , 2004 .

[30]  Antonio Nesticò,et al.  Sustainability of urban regeneration projects: Novel selection model based on analytic network process and zero-one goal programming , 2020 .

[31]  Jose M. Enguita,et al.  Conoscopic holography-based long-standoff profilometer for surface inspection in adverse environment , 2006 .

[32]  Shahzad Faizi,et al.  Group Decision-Making for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Based on Characteristic Objects Method , 2017, Symmetry.

[33]  Lidija Kraujalienė,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 2019, Business, Management and Education.

[34]  Shankha Shubhra Goswami,et al.  Analysis of a Robot Selection Problem Using Two Newly Developed Hybrid MCDM Models of TOPSIS-ARAS and COPRAS-ARAS , 2021, Symmetry.

[35]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy , 2020, Omega.

[36]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[37]  Zaiming Liu,et al.  An Extension TOPSIS Method Based on the Decision Maker's Risk Attitude and the Adjusted Probabilistic Fuzzy Set , 2021, Symmetry.

[38]  Nasser Yimen,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: Applying a Modified Brown–Gibson Model and RETScreen Software to the Optimal Location Process of Utility-Scale Photovoltaic Plants , 2019, Processes.

[39]  Antonio Nesticò,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings , 2019, Sustainability.

[40]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .