Eyespot behavior during the fertilization of gametes in Ulva arasakii Chihara (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta)

Behavior of the eyespots during the fertilization of Ulva arasakii Chihara was studied using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE‐SEM). FE‐SEM enabled the visualization of the eyespot of biflagellate male and female gametes. The smaller male gamete has one protruded smaller (1.3 ± 0.15 μm× 1.0 ± 0.29 μm) eyespot and the larger female gamete has a larger (1.6 ± 0.2 μm× 1.1 ± 0.13 μm) one on a posterior position of the cell. The cell membrane over the eyespot region is relatively smooth compared to other parts of the cell body and exhibits hexagonal arranged lipid globules. Because the size of the cell and the morphology of the eyespot are different between male and female gametes, we could follow the fate of the eyespots during the fertilization. The initial cytoplasmic contact and fusion of the gametes takes place at their anterior end, slightly posterior to the flagellar base. The morphology of the fusing gametes followed two clearly distinguishable patterns. About half the gamete pairs lie side‐by‐side with their longitudinal axes nearly parallel, while the rest are oriented anti‐parallel to each other. In all cases, the larger female gamete fused along the same side as the eyespot, while the smaller male gamete fused along the side away from its eyespot. As fusion proceeds, the gamete pair is transformed into the quadriflagellate planozygote, in which the eyespots are positioned side‐by‐side on the region of cell fusion. These observations indicated that the opposite positioning of the eyespot relative to the cell fusion site in male and female gametes is important for the proper arrangement of the eyespots in the planozygote. The significance of this feature in advanced green algae is briefly discussed.

[1]  P. Kornmann,et al.  Meeresalgen von Helgoland , 1977, Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen.

[2]  C. O'kelly,et al.  The fine structure of motile cells in the generaUlvaria andMonostroma, with special reference to the taxonomic position ofMonostroma oxyspermum (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) , 1984, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[3]  G. Kreimer Light perception and signal modulation during photoorientation of flagellate , 2001 .

[4]  G. Kreimer Chapter 7 Light perception and signal modulation during photoorientation of flagellate green algae , 2001 .

[5]  T. Nakayama,et al.  Ultrastructure of the biflagellate gametes of Collinsiella cava (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) , 2000 .

[6]  Peter Hegemann,et al.  Vision in microalgae , 1997, Planta.

[7]  M. Clayton Propagules of marine macroalgae: Structure and development , 1992 .

[8]  S. Dutcher,et al.  Cellular asymmetry in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[9]  M. Melkonian,et al.  Comparative ultrastructure of eyespot membranes in gametes and zoospores of the green alga Ulva lactuca (Ulvales). , 1981, Journal of cell science.

[10]  K. Foster,et al.  Light Antennas in phototactic algae. , 1980, Microbiological reviews.

[11]  M. Melkonian Flagellar roots, mating structure and gametic fusion in the green alga Ulva lactuca (Ulvales). , 1980, Journal of cell science.

[12]  T. Bråten The ultrastructure of fertilization and zygote formation in the green alga Ulva mutabilis Foyn. , 1971, Journal of cell science.

[13]  M. Chihara Ulva arasakii, a new species of green algae : its life history and taxonomy , 1969 .

[14]  H. Hirose Studies on the Morphology and Behaviour of the Reproductive Cells of Chaetomorpha Okamurai Ueda , 1954 .

[15]  G. M. Smith On the reproduction of some Pacific Coast species of Ulva. , 1947, American journal of botany.

[16]  K. Miyaké On the conjugation of the gametes and the development of the zoospores in Ulvaceae , 1931 .