Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative

Abstract Objective In response to COVID-19, the informatics community united to aggregate as much clinical data as possible to characterize this new disease and reduce its impact through collaborative analytics. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is now the largest publicly available HIPAA limited dataset in US history with over 6.4 million patients and is a testament to a partnership of over 100 organizations. Materials and Methods We developed a pipeline for ingesting, harmonizing, and centralizing data from 56 contributing data partners using 4 federated Common Data Models. N3C data quality (DQ) review involves both automated and manual procedures. In the process, several DQ heuristics were discovered in our centralized context, both within the pipeline and during downstream project-based analysis. Feedback to the sites led to many local and centralized DQ improvements. Results Beyond well-recognized DQ findings, we discovered 15 heuristics relating to source Common Data Model conformance, demographics, COVID tests, conditions, encounters, measurements, observations, coding completeness, and fitness for use. Of 56 sites, 37 sites (66%) demonstrated issues through these heuristics. These 37 sites demonstrated improvement after receiving feedback. Discussion We encountered site-to-site differences in DQ which would have been challenging to discover using federated checks alone. We have demonstrated that centralized DQ benchmarking reveals unique opportunities for DQ improvement that will support improved research analytics locally and in aggregate. Conclusion By combining rapid, continual assessment of DQ with a large volume of multisite data, it is possible to support more nuanced scientific questions with the scale and rigor that they require.

[1]  Guoqian Jiang,et al.  Feasibility of capturing real-world data from health information technology systems at multiple centers to assess cardiac ablation device outcomes: A fit-for-purpose informatics analysis report , 2021, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Andrew E. Williams,et al.  Clinical Characterization and Prediction of Clinical Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among US Adults Using Data From the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative , 2021, JAMA network open.

[3]  S. Hewitt,et al.  Improving data quality in observational research studies: Report of the Cure Glomerulonephropathy (CureGN) network , 2021, Contemporary clinical trials communications.

[4]  Yonghui Wu,et al.  Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data , 2020, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Philip R. O. Payne,et al.  The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment , 2020, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  K. Zivin,et al.  Innovative Solutions for State Medicaid Programs to Leverage Their Data, Build Their Analytic Capacity, and Create Evidence-Based Policy , 2019, EGEMS.

[7]  Douglas Boyle,et al.  Improving a Secondary Use Health Data Warehouse: Proposing a Multi-Level Data Quality Framework , 2019, EGEMS.

[8]  Levon Utidjian,et al.  Design and Refinement of a Data Quality Assessment Workflow for a Large Pediatric Research Network , 2019, EGEMS.

[9]  Reesa Laws,et al.  Data Quality Assessment and Multi-Organizational Reporting: Tools to Enhance Network Knowledge , 2019, EGEMS.

[10]  M. Stapff.  Using real world data to assess cardiovascular outcomes of two antidiabetic treatment classes , 2018, World journal of diabetes.

[11]  O. Duru.  Dashboard , 2018, Shipping Business Unwrapped.

[12]  Shyam Visweswaran,et al.  Accrual to Clinical Trials (ACT): A Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium Network , 2018, JAMIA open.

[13]  Keith Marsolo,et al.  Evaluating Foundational Data Quality in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet®) , 2018, EGEMS.

[14]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data , 2016, EGEMS.

[15]  Richard Platt,et al.  Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[16]  Karen J. Wernli,et al.  How the Provenance of Electronic Health Record Data Matters for Research: A Case Example Using System Mapping , 2014, EGEMS.

[17]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Defining and measuring completeness of electronic health records for secondary use , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  Meredith Nahm,et al.  A comprehensive framework for data quality assessment in CER , 2013, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[19]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  J. Steiner,et al.  A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research. , 2012, Medical care.

[21]  R. Platt,et al.  Developing the Sentinel System--a national resource for evidence development. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Overhage,et al.  Advancing the Science for Active Surveillance: Rationale and Design for the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  Patrick B. Ryan,et al.  Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Yu-Chuan Li,et al.  Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers , 2015, MedInfo.

[25]  Meredith Nahm,et al.  Data Quality in Clinical Research , 2012 .

[26]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  The Role of Research in Integrated Health Care Systems: The HMO Research Network. , 2004, The Permanente journal.