Stimulating Multiple-Demand Cortex Enhances Vocabulary Learning

It is well established that networks within multiple-demand cortex (MDC) become active when diverse skills and behaviors are being learnt. However, their causal role in learning remains to be established. In the present study, we first performed functional magnetic resonance imaging on healthy female and male human participants to confirm that MDC was most active in the initial stages of learning a novel vocabulary, consisting of pronounceable nonwords (pseudowords), each associated with a picture of a real object. We then examined, in healthy female and male human participants, whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of a frontal midline node of the cingulo-opercular MDC affected learning rates specifically during the initial stages of learning. We report that stimulation of this node, but not a control brain region, substantially improved both accuracy and response times during the earliest stage of learning pseudoword–object associations. This stimulation had no effect on the processing of established vocabulary, tested by the accuracy and response times when participants decided whether a real word was accurately paired with a picture of an object. These results provide evidence that noninvasive stimulation to MDC nodes can enhance learning rates, thereby demonstrating their causal role in the learning process. We propose that this causal role makes MDC candidate target for experimental therapeutics; for example, in stroke patients with aphasia attempting to reacquire a vocabulary. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Learning a task involves the brain system within which that specific task becomes established. Therefore, successfully learning a new vocabulary establishes the novel words in the language system. However, there is evidence that in the early stages of learning, networks within multiple-demand cortex (MDC), which control higher cognitive functions, such as working memory, attention, and monitoring of performance, become active. This activity declines once the task is learnt. The present study demonstrated that a node within MDC, located in midline frontal cortex, becomes active during the early stage of learning a novel vocabulary. Importantly, noninvasive brain stimulation of this node improved performance during this stage of learning. This observation demonstrated that MDC activity is important for learning.

[1]  M. Botvinick,et al.  The Contribution of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Executive Processes in Cognition , 1999, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[2]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Berardelli,et al.  Effects of repetitive cortical stimulation on the silent period evoked by magnetic stimulation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[5]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  The Cingulo-Opercular Network Provides Word-Recognition Benefit , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Owen,et al.  Fractionating attentional control using event-related fMRI. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[8]  E. Jefferies,et al.  Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: Mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Duncan An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex , 2001 .

[10]  G. Raboyeau,et al.  Right hemisphere activation in recovery from aphasia , 2008, Neurology.

[11]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[14]  Walter Schneider,et al.  The Brain’s Learning and Control Architecture , 2012 .

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  rTMS to the right inferior parietal lobule disrupts self-other discrimination. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[18]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Inferior Parietal Lobule Contributions to Visual Word Recognition , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[20]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Adrian M. Owen,et al.  Dissociable roles for lateral orbitofrontal cortex and lateral prefrontal cortex during preference driven reversal learning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  Towards an understanding of the neural dynamics of intentional learning: Considering the timescale , 2016, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Robert Leech,et al.  Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Buckner,et al.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visuomotor Skill Learning in Human Subjects Examined with Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Coltheart,et al.  358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  U Klose,et al.  Dynamic pattern of brain activation during sequencing of word strings evaluated by fMRI. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  W. Schneider,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of practice-related change: fMRI and meta-analytic evidence of a domain-general control network for learning. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  L. Cohen,et al.  Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Neurology.

[34]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  M. Hallett,et al.  Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Adam R. Walczak,et al.  At the heart of the ventral attention system: The right anterior insula , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Richard J. S. Wise,et al.  Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery? , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Robert Leech,et al.  Domain-general subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex contribute to recovery of language after stroke , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  R. Passingham,et al.  Learning Arbitrary Visuomotor Associations: Temporal Dynamic of Brain Activity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  E G Jones,et al.  Making brain connections: neuroanatomy and the work of TPS Powell, 1923-1996. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  B. Rossion,et al.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.

[44]  M Ingvar,et al.  Dynamic changes in the functional anatomy of thehuman brain during recall of abstract designs related topractice , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  Novel vs. Well-learned Memory for Faces: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  P. Jennum,et al.  Repetitive magnetic stimulation and motor evoked potentials. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  L. Uddin Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  John E. Desmond,et al.  Enhancement of Phonological Memory Following Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[49]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[50]  P. Grasby,et al.  PET activation of the medial temporal lobe in learning. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[51]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Networks of domain-specific and general regions involved in episodic memory for spatial location and object identity , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  D. Sharp,et al.  Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Expertise with Artificial Nonspeech Sounds Recruits Speech-Sensitive Cortical Regions , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Thought Beyond Language , 2012, Psychological science.

[56]  E Borg,et al.  Acoustic trauma in extracranial magnetic brain stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  Robert Leech,et al.  Network dysfunction predicts speech production after left hemisphere stroke , 2016, Neurology.

[58]  Roland Sparing,et al.  Enhancing Picture Naming with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[59]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Executive Semantic Processing Is Underpinned by a Large-scale Neural Network: Revealing the Contribution of Left Prefrontal, Posterior Temporal, and Parietal Cortex to Controlled Retrieval and Selection Using TMS , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Agrammatic but numerate. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  II. PET Studies of Memory: Novel versus Practiced Free Recall of Word Lists , 1995, NeuroImage.

[62]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  D. Brooks,et al.  Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[64]  Robert Leech,et al.  Network mechanisms of intentional learning , 2016, NeuroImage.

[65]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: An rTMS study , 2008, Brain Research.

[67]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[68]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid‐rate transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1991, Neurology.

[69]  B. Fierro,et al.  Facilitatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS in motor cortex of patients affected by migraine with aura , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[70]  C. Price The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[71]  Robert Leech,et al.  Overlapping Networks Engaged during Spoken Language Production and Its Cognitive Control , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.