Soil quality assessment in domesticated forests – a southern pine example

Maintenance and enhancement of soil productivity is central to the long-term success of intensive forest management. A simple technique is required for monitoring the effects of different management practices on soils as an aid in developing codes of practice that foster maintenance and enhancement of soil productivity. The objective of our work was to determine if management impacts on soil productivity could be assessed using the soil-quality concepts developed in agriculture. A soil-quality index (SQI) model, that measures the effects of management practices on five key growth-determining attributes of forest soils, namely (1) promote root growth, (2) store, supply and cycle nutrients, (3) accept, hold, and supply water, (4) promote gas exchange, and (5) promote biological activity, was developed and tested as part of a controlled study in intensively-managed pine plantations on the Lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Three 20-ha, 20-year-old loblolly pine plantations were harvested under wet and dry conditions to create a broad gradient in soil disturbance. Within each harvested plantation, a subset of 3-ha plots were site prepared by either bedding or mole-plowing plus bedding, then all sites were established as third-rotation pine plantations. Field data were collected spatially for soil bulk density, net N mineralization, water table depth, soil aeration, and soil moisture. Literature-based sufficiency values were determined for each property and substituted into the SQI model as surrogate indicators for the five key attributes, thus obtaining spatial SQI predictions within each harvesting and site preparation treatment. Our study results demonstrate how SQI monitoring could be used to identify the effects of management practices on soil productivity, which should aid in developing codes of practice as a component of achieving long-term sustainability in domesticated forests.

[1]  E. Paul,et al.  Soil microbiology and biochemistry. , 1998 .

[2]  R. Powers,et al.  Sustained Productivity of Forest Soils , 1990 .

[3]  D. Hook,et al.  Wet site pine management in the southeastern United States. , 1988 .

[4]  E. White,et al.  Water table control and fertilization for Pine production in the flatwoods. , 1970 .

[5]  W. E. Larson,et al.  The Dynamics of Soil Quality as a Measure of Sustainable Management , 1994 .

[6]  Elizabeth A. Peck,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2001 .

[7]  E. R. Allen,et al.  Air Quality and Atmospheric Deposition in Southern U.S. Forests , 1996 .

[8]  E. Perfect,et al.  Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils , 1994 .

[9]  J. Burger,et al.  Soil Quality Monitoring for Assessing Sustainable Forest Management , 2015 .

[10]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Soil Productivity Index: Predictions of Site Quality for White Spruce Plantations , 1991 .

[11]  John W. Doran,et al.  Steady‐State Aerobic Microbial Activity as a Function of Soil Water Content , 1990 .

[12]  D. Karlen,et al.  A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality , 1994 .

[13]  C. W. Ralston,et al.  Soil disturbances in logging: effects on soil characteristics and growth of loblolly pine in the Atlantic Coastal Plain , 1970 .

[14]  C. F. Eno,et al.  Nitrate Production in the Field by Incubating the Soil in Polyethylene Bags , 1960 .

[15]  Y. Ouyang,et al.  Dynamic Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Exchange between Soil and Atmosphere: II. Model Simulations , 1992 .

[16]  K. Rennolls,et al.  Timber Management-A Quantitative Approach. , 1984 .

[17]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[18]  Pacific Northwest Cooperative Extension,et al.  Compaction of forest soils , 1981 .

[19]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Manipulation of water and nutrients - practice and opportunity in southern U.S. pine forests. , 1990 .

[20]  Robert L. Late.  Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment , 1995 .

[21]  W. H. Mckee,et al.  Depth of water table and redox potential of soil affect Slash Pine growth. , 1970 .

[22]  P. Dougherty.  Response of Loblolly Pine to Moisture and Nutrient Stress , 1996 .

[23]  L. N. Kiniry,et al.  A soil productivity index based upon predicted water depletion and root growth , 1983 .

[24]  J. Burger,et al.  Site Preparation Effects on Soil Moisture and Available Nutrients in a Pine Plantation in the Florida Flatwoods , 1988 .

[25]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Magnitude, Duration, and Economic Analysis of Loblolly Pine Growth Response Following Bedding and Phosphorus Fertilization , 1986 .

[26]  J. Olsen,et al.  A glasshouse evaluation of 'critical' N and P concentrations and N:P ratios in various plant parts of six eucalypt species. , 1990 .

[27]  W. Aust,et al.  Compaction and Rutting During Harvesting Affect Better Drained Soils More Than Poorly Drained Soils on Wet Pine Flats , 1995 .

[28]  M. Frere,et al.  TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT OF SOIL NITROGEN MINERALIZATION , 1973 .

[29]  J. Haywood,et al.  Site Preparation and Fertilization Effects on Growth of Slash Pine for Two Rotations , 1996 .

[30]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  NITROGEN MINERALIZATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN 50 HARDWOOD AND CONIFER STANDS ON DIVERSE SOILS , 1997 .

[31]  James A. Burger,et al.  Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management , 1999 .

[32]  Timothy B. Parkin,et al.  Defining and Assessing Soil Quality , 1994 .

[33]  W. H. Mckee,et al.  Slash Pine Biomass Response to Site Preparation and Soil Properties 1 , 1974 .

[34]  James A. Burger,et al.  Limitations of Bioassays for Monitoring Forest Soil Productivity: Rationale and Example , 1996 .

[35]  R. Buresh,et al.  Light Fraction Soil Organic Matter and Available Nitrogen following Trees and Maize , 1997 .

[36]  A. Hassan,et al.  The Impact of Harvesting and Site Preparation on the Physical Properties of Lower Coastal Plain Forest Soils , 1983 .

[37]  R. Mickler,et al.  Impact of Air Pollutants on Southern Pine Forests , 1996, Ecological Studies.

[38]  E. Nambiar.  Sustained Productivity of Forests Is a Continuing Challenge to Soil Science , 1996 .

[39]  D. Hook,et al.  Variation in growth of red alder families in relation to shallow water table levels. , 1987 .

[40]  W. J. Dyck,et al.  Impacts of Forest Harvesting on Long-Term Site Productivity , 1994, Springer Netherlands.

[41]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  Disturbance, nitrogen availability, and nitrogen losses in an intensively managed loblolly pine plantation , 1985 .

[42]  A. Klute,et al.  Physical and mineralogical methods , 1986 .

[43]  W. E. Larson,et al.  Productivity of soils: Assessing long-term changes due to erosion , 1983 .

[44]  D. C. Erbach,et al.  Tilth index: an approach to quantifying soil tilth. , 1992 .

[45]  W. Aust,et al.  Soil Physical and Hydrological Changes Associated with Logging a Wet Pine Flat with Wide-Tired Skidders , 1993 .

[46]  M. Duryea,et al.  Forest Regeneration Manual , 1991, Forestry Sciences.

[47]  R. Sands,et al.  Compaction of forest soils. A review , 1980 .

[48]  R. Campbell,et al.  Soil and Site Potential , 1991 .

[49]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[50]  J. Aber,et al.  Primary production and nitrogen allocation of field grown sugar maples in relation to nitrogen availability , 1985 .

[51]  R. Miller,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE AS PROVIDED BY FIELD TRIALS , 1994 .

[52]  F. Ponnamperuma.  The Chemistry of Submerged Soils , 1972 .