Measuring excreta patch distribution in grazed pasture through low‐cost image analysis

Nutrient losses from grazed pasture are an important non-point source of water pollution. The distribution of animal urine patches on pasture is an important factor in determining nitrate losses and influencing pasture growth, nutritive value and pasture acceptability to livestock, as a high amount of nitrogen (N) is deposited onto a small area of soil under a urine patch. Urine distribution may be recorded during or post-grazing. Measurements during grazing have been automated, but post-grazing measurement currently relies on manual observations that are time consuming and cannot be subsequently verified. To automate post-grazing measurements, aerial photographs were taken of grazed pasture approximately 14 d post-grazing using a standard digital camera. Pasture response areas were successfully identified by analysing the hue of the images using readily available software, yielding comparable results to manual counts. The majority of dung patches did not produce observable pasture responses, with only 14% of the visible response areas being associated with dung, so although this method cannot distinguish between urine and dung response areas, it is primarily influenced by urine. Provided photographs are taken in full sunlight with a high-quality camera, excreta patch numbers, areas and spatial distribution can be measured with a high degree of precision. Furthermore, the method is relatively inexpensive and applicable to a wide range of situations. A permanent photographic record of the pasture is also established, which allows verification of the analysis in future.

[1]  B. W. Doak Some chemical changes in the nitrogenous constituents of urine when voided on pasture , 1952, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[2]  R. G. Petersen,et al.  The Distribution of Excreta by Freely Grazing Cattle and Its Effect on Pasture Fertility: I. Excretal Distribution1 , 1956 .

[3]  C. W. Wood,et al.  Chlorophyll meter predicts nitrogen status of tall fescue , 1996 .

[4]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[5]  P. Williams,et al.  Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem , 1993 .

[6]  L D King,et al.  Spatial and time distribution of dairy cattle excreta in an intensive pasture system. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[7]  H. Di,et al.  The use of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), to decrease nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions in a simulated grazed and irrigated grassland , 2002 .

[8]  K. Betteridge,et al.  Urine distribution and grazing behaviour of female sheep and cattle grazing a steep New Zealand hill pasture , 2010 .

[9]  H. Di,et al.  Nitrate leaching losses and pasture yields as affected by different rates of animal urine nitrogen returns and application of a nitrification inhibitor—a lysimeter study , 2007, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[10]  D. Maclusky SOME ESTIMATES OF THE AREAS OF PASTURE FOULED BY THE EXCRETA OF DAIRY COWS , 1960 .

[11]  H. Di,et al.  The spatial coverage of dairy cattle urine patches in an intensively grazed pasture system , 2010, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[12]  I. Richards,et al.  The spatial distribution of excreta under intensive cattle grazing , 1976 .

[13]  M. Nguyen,et al.  Sulphur cycling and its implications on sulphur fertilizer requirements of grazed grassland ecosystems , 1994 .