Adaptive multi‐rate interface: development and experimental verification for real‐time hybrid simulation

simulation DTU Orbit (24/12/2018) Adaptive multi-rate interface: development and experimental verification for real-time hybrid simulation Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is a powerful cyber-physical technique that is a relatively cost-effective method to perform global/local system evaluation of structural systems. A major factor that determines the ability of an RTHS to represent true system-level behavior is the fidelity of the numerical substructure. While the use of higher-order models increases fidelity of the simulation, it also increases the demand for computational resources. Because RTHS is executed at real-time, in a conventional RTHS configuration, this increase in computational resources may limit the achievable sampling frequencies and/or introduce delays that can degrade its stability and performance. In this study, the Adaptive Multi-rate Interface rate-transitioning and compensation technique is developed to enable the use of more complex numerical models. Such a multi-rate RTHS is strictly executed at real-time, although it employs different time steps in the numerical and the physical substructures while including rate-transitioning to link the components appropriately. Typically, a higher-order numerical substructure model is solved at larger time intervals, and is coupled with a physical substructure that is driven at smaller time intervals for actuator control purposes. Through a series of simulations, the performance of the AMRI and several existing approaches for multi-rate RTHS is compared. It is noted that compared with existing methods, AMRI leads to a smaller error, especially at higher ratios of sampling frequency between the numerical and physical substructures and for input signals with high-frequency content. Further, it does not induce signal chattering at the coupling frequency. The effectiveness of AMRI is also verified experimentally.

[1]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Enabling role of hybrid simulation across NEES in advancing earthquake engineering , 2015 .

[2]  Mohammad-Reza Alam,et al.  Real time hybrid modeling for ocean wave energy converters , 2015 .

[3]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Studies on Real-Time Testing of Structures with Elastomeric Dampers , 2009 .

[4]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .

[5]  Chenyang Lu,et al.  A real-time scheduling service for parallel tasks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 19th Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS).

[6]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Seismic Retrofit of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames with High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels: Large-Scale Hybrid Simulation Experiments , 2014 .

[7]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  The development of multi-axis real-time substructure testing , 2006 .

[8]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Using Shake Tables and Dynamic Actuators , 2011 .

[9]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real‐time hybrid structural simulation , 2008 .

[10]  Anthony Joseph Friedman Development and experimental validation of a new control strategy considering device dynamics for large-scale MR dampers using real-time hybrid simulation , 2012 .

[11]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Establishing a stability switch criterion for effective implementation of real-time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[12]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Model-Based Multiactuator Control for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .

[13]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Experimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motion , 2011 .

[14]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems , 1999 .

[15]  Toshihiko Horiuchi,et al.  Development of a Real-Time Hybrid Experimental System Using a Shaking Table : (Proposal of Experiment Concept and Feasibility Study with Rigid Secondary System) , 1999 .

[16]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Real-time dynamic hybrid testing for soil–structure interaction analysis , 2011 .

[17]  Toshihiko Horiuchi,et al.  A new method for compensating actuator delay in real–time hybrid experiments , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Improving the inverse compensation method for real‐time hybrid simulation through a dual compensation scheme , 2009 .

[19]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[20]  Zhaoshuo Jiang,et al.  A comparison of 200 kN magneto-rheological damper models for use in real-time hybrid simulation pretesting , 2011 .

[21]  M.I. Wallace,et al.  An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Novel coupling Rosenbrock‐based algorithms for real‐time dynamic substructure testing , 2008 .

[23]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic design and hybrid tests of a full‐scale three‐story buckling‐restrained braced frame using welded end connections and thin profile , 2012 .