Objective image quality measurement by local spatial‐frequency wavelet analysis

An essential determinant of the value of surrogate digital images is their quality. Image quality measurement has become crucial for most image processing applications. Over the past years, there have been many attempts to develop models or metrics for image quality that incorporate elements of human visual sensitivity. However, there is no current standard and objective definition of spectral image quality. This paper proposes a reliable automatic method for objective image quality measurement by local spatial‐frequency wavelet analysis. The analysis is performed locally by dividing an image into 64×64 pixel blocks, and transforming the data into wavelet domain and sub‐band image domain. A fast lifting wavelet algorithm is developed for computationally efficient spatial‐frequency deconstruction of images to extract the features of edges in sub‐band datasets. Wavelet analysis throughout the spatial‐frequency range with respect to noise, sharpness, brightness, contrast, and modulation transfer function (MTF) reveals more detailed information to relate the quality of an image to the interpretation by using an artificial neural network to optimize weightings and results in a promising quantitative measure of image quality. Experimental results from using this method for image quality measurement exhibit good correlation to subjective visual quality assessments. The proposed approach with fast computation provides a potential metric for reliable image quality quantification, allowing image quality to be automatically evaluated following image capture/compression, but prior to permanent storage in a database.

[1]  Gaoyong Luo A novel technique of image quality objective measurement by wavelet analysis throughout the spatial frequency range , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Ram M. Narayanan,et al.  Noise estimation in remote sensing imagery using data masking , 2003 .

[3]  Robert J. Marks,et al.  Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[4]  Robert D. Fiete,et al.  Understanding image quality losses due to smear in high-resolution remote sensing imaging systems , 1999 .

[5]  W. Sweldens The Lifting Scheme: A Custom - Design Construction of Biorthogonal Wavelets "Industrial Mathematics , 1996 .

[6]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage , 1995 .

[7]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[8]  A. Aldroubi,et al.  Wavelets in Medicine and Biology , 1997 .

[9]  J C Leachtenauer,et al.  General Image-Quality Equation: GIQE. , 1997, Applied optics.

[10]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[11]  INGRID DAUBECHIES,et al.  Factoring Wavelet Transforms into Lifting Steps Honours Thesis ( 1997 ) , 1996 .

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[14]  Tien D. Bui,et al.  Multivariate statistical modeling for image denoising using wavelet transforms , 2005, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[15]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Visibility of noise in natural images , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[16]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Factoring wavelet transforms into lifting steps , 1998 .

[17]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  Zhou Wang,et al.  No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[19]  Chandrika Kamath,et al.  Denoising through wavelet shrinkage: an empirical study , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Françoise Bellegarde,et al.  Transformation Ordering , 1987, TAPSOFT, Vol.1.

[21]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[22]  Wim Sweldens,et al.  The lifting scheme: a construction of second generation wavelets , 1998 .

[23]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Image quality and entropy masking , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Color image quality on the Internet , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[25]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[26]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[28]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Quality metric design: a closer look , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[29]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Wavelet Transforms That Map Integers to Integers , 1998 .