Volume rendering compared with maximum intensity projection for magnetic resonance angiography measurements of the abdominal aorta

Purpose: To compare the volume rendering technique (VRT) with maximum intensity projection (MIP) for aortic diameter measurements in MR angiography (MRA) data sets. Material and Methods: Existing contrast‐enhanced 3‐dimensional MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) data sets from 20 patients were analyzed. In each MRA data set, two aortic diameters were measured using MIP and VRT. Agreement with DSA measurements, dependence on rendering parameters, and interobserver agreement were assessed. Results: Diameters measured on MIP with fixed parameters showed no significant difference compared with DSA and with freely selected parameters a slight overestimation relative to DSA. Diameters measured on VRT were larger than on DSA. For both MIP and VRT, the measurements depended on the chosen parameters. The error relative to DSA was larger for VRT than for MIP with fixed parameters but not with freely chosen parameters. Interobserver agreement did not differ significantly. Conclusions: VRT is not suitable for diameter measurements of the abdominal aorta with fixed parameter settings but may be useful with user‐selected settings.

[1]  G Kretschmer,et al.  Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  Michael Schocke,et al.  3D MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  James M. Keller,et al.  Image segmentation in the presence of uncertainty , 1990, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  R L Galloway,et al.  Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  M. Prince.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. , 1990, Radiology.

[7]  Michael Schocke,et al.  Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  S. Napel,et al.  Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  P. Waldenberger,et al.  Investigation of cerebrovascular disease with MR angiography: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms – initial assessment , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[10]  J Vanderschoot,et al.  Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  A. Persson,et al.  Measurements before endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: MR imaging with MRA vs. angiography and CT , 2003 .

[13]  M. Horrocks,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms with measurements obtained by other imaging techniques and intraoperative measurements: possible implications for endovascular grafting. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.