DESIGN METHODS FOR ROCKET ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO ACTUATOR SATURATION

5Thompson, P. M., Myers, T. T., and Suchomel, C., “Conventional Autopilot Design for a Hypersonic Vehicle,” AIAA Paper 95-0556, Jan. 1995. 6Larson, G. L., Klyde, D. H., Myers, T. T., and McRuer, D. T., “Military Missions and Linearized Model for a Hypersonic Vehicle,” AIAA Paper 95-0851, Jan. 1995. 7Vu, P. T., and Biezad, D. J., “Direct-Lift Design Strategy for Longitudinal Control of Hypersonic Aircraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1260–1266. 8Schmidt, D. K., and Velapoldi, J., “Optimum Mission Performance and Guidance for Hypersonic Single Stage to Orbit,” AIAA Paper 96-3904, July 1996. 9Schmidt, D. K., “Optimum Mission Performance and Multivariable Flight Guidance for Airbreathing Launch Vehicles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1997, pp. 1157–1164. 10Sachs, G., Schoder, W., and Kraus, W., “Separation of Lifting Vehicles at HypersonicSpeed—Wind TunnelTests and FlightDynamics Simulation,” SpaceSystemsDesign andDevelopment Testing, AGARDCP 561,1995,pp. 5-1–5-8. 11Bowers, A., Noffz, G., Gonda,M., and Iliff, K., “A Generic Hypersonic Aerodynamic Model Example (GHAME),” NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards AFB, CA, 1989. 12Meyer, I., McMaster, I., and Moody, R., “Handling Qualities of the SR-71,” Lockheed Aircraft Corp., Rept. SP-508, Advanced Development Projects, Burbank, CA, Sept. 1978. 13Hef ey, R., and Jewell, W., “Aircraft Handling Qualities Data,” NASA CR 2144, Dec. 1972. 14Sachs, G., “Path-AttitudeDecouplingand FlyingQualities Implications in Hypersonic Flight,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1998, pp. 49–59.