Maximum likelihood remission calibration for groups of heterogeneous laser scanners

Laser range scanners are commonly used in mobile robotics to enable a robot to sense the spatial configuration of its environment. In addition to the range measurements, most scanners provide remission values, representing the intensity of the returned light pulse. These values add a visual component to the measurement and can be used to improve reasoning on the data. Unfortunately, a remission value does not directly tell us how bright a measured surface is in the infrared spectrum. Rather, it varies with respect to the incidence angle and the range at which it was measured. In addition, multiple scanners typically do not agree upon the values of a certain surface. In this paper, we present a calibration method for remission values of multiple laser scanners considering dependencies in range, incidence angle of the measured surface, and the respective scanner unit. Our system learns the calibration parameters based on a set of registered point clouds. It uses a graph optimization scheme to minimize the error between different measurements, so that all involved scanners yield consistent reflection values, independent of the perspective from which the corresponding surface is observed.

[1]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Unsupervised Calibration for Multi-beam Lasers , 2010, ISER.

[2]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Place recognition in 3D scans using a combination of bag of words and point feature based relative pose estimation , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Simon Lacroix,et al.  Calibration of a rotating multi-beam lidar , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Achim J. Lilienthal,et al.  Vision Aided 3D Laser Based Registration , 2007, EMCR.

[5]  Paul Timothy Furgale,et al.  Lighting‐invariant Visual Teach and Repeat Using Appearance‐based Lidar , 2013, J. Field Robotics.

[6]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  G2o: A general framework for graph optimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Incidence angle influence on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2009 .

[8]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Robust vehicle localization in urban environments using probabilistic maps , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Study of surface brightness from backscattered laser intensity: calibration of laser data , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[10]  Paul Newman,et al.  Lost in translation (and rotation): Rapid extrinsic calibration for 2D and 3D LIDARs , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Paul Newman,et al.  Self-calibration for a 3D laser , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Identifying vegetation from laser data in structured outdoor environments , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..