Experimental Designs for Next Generation Phenotyping

The increase in popularity of high-throughput genotyping in breeding programs is associated with recent advances in DNA sequencing technology and large decreases in genotyping costs. However, the limits of using genotyping for making predictions and, therefore, identifying potential candidate materials for selection thus reside in the quality of the phenotyping. High-throughput phenotyping technologies have been developed and implemented prior to planting and during cultivation. Much of this phenotyping has occurred in relatively small and restricted environments where many influential factors in the quality of phenotype can be adequately controlled. In many situations, however, it is necessary to perform phenotyping under field conditions. In this case, depending on the characteristic of interest to be collected, the influence of factors difficult to be controlled in such adverse conditions can cause the need for use of alternatives that can ensure a sufficiently accurate and precise phenotyping. In this sense, the science of Statistics contributes with an important role, either in the use of traditional basic concepts, in the planning of controlled experiments, or in modeling and developing appropriate analyzes. This chapter will discuss several experimental designs that can potentially be used for phenotyping under variable conditions, describing their various characteristics. Also it will address on topics related to the problem of obtaining accurate and precise phenotypic information, and the role of statistics in the success of this venture so fashionable today.

[1]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[2]  Fabio Fiorani,et al.  The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[3]  W. Federer,et al.  Combining Results from Augmented Designs Over Sites , 2001 .

[4]  M. H. Barbosa,et al.  Sample size for full-sib family evaluation in sugarcane , 2009 .

[5]  M. H. Barbosa,et al.  Designs and model effects definitions in the initial stage of a plant breeding program , 2006 .

[6]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs , 1976 .

[7]  J. Faraway Linear Models with R , 2014 .

[8]  J. Poland,et al.  Increased Genomic Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Through Spatial Adjustment of Field Trial Data , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[9]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .

[10]  David R. Cox Planning of Experiments , 1958 .

[11]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[12]  Kai Sonder,et al.  Phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize. , 2012, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[13]  A. C. Matheson,et al.  Experimental Design and Analysis for Use in Tree Improvement. , 1995 .

[14]  Post Blocking Gone Too Far! Recovery of Information and Spatial Analysis in Field Experiments , 2000, Biometrics.

[15]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  The Arrangement of Field Experiments , 1992 .

[16]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental designs, 2nd ed. , 1957 .

[17]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[18]  R. Doerge,et al.  Statistical Design and Analysis of RNA Sequencing Data , 2010, Genetics.

[19]  M. Barbosa,et al.  Delineamentos aumentados no melhoramento de plantas em condições de restrições de recursos , 2009 .

[20]  E. Williams A new class of resolvable block designs , 1975 .

[21]  W. David Kelton,et al.  Statistical design and analysis , 1986, WSC '86.

[22]  José Crossa,et al.  High-throughput phenotyping and genomic selection: the frontiers of crop breeding converge. , 2012, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[23]  G. A. Milliken,et al.  A SAS program for analyzing augmented randomized complete-block designs , 1993 .

[24]  James H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach (2nd ed) , 1980 .

[25]  C. Haley,et al.  Genomewide Rapid Association Using Mixed Model and Regression: A Fast and Simple Method For Genomewide Pedigree-Based Quantitative Trait Loci Association Analysis , 2007, Genetics.

[26]  M. H. Barbosa,et al.  Effects of plot size on the estimation of genetic parameters in sugarcane families. , 2006 .

[27]  P. Cornelius,et al.  Modeling genotype × environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes , 2006 .

[28]  J. Araus,et al.  Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[29]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments: Advanced Experimental Design , 2005 .