Feasibility of 1.6-mm isotropic voxel diffusion tensor tractography in depicting limbic fibers

IntroductionWe attempted to assess the feasibility of a 1.6-mm isotropic voxel diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography at 3T in visualizing nerve bundles in the limbic system.MethodsWe examined 20 healthy volunteers by conventional DTI with a voxel size of 1.6 × 1.6 × 3.0 mm and by high-resolution DTI with a voxel size of 1.6 × 1.6 × 1.6 mm and generated tractographs of three limbic nerve bundles: the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus. We visually assessed whether these bundles reached their targets and compared their diffusion parameters between the two techniques.ResultsThe entire pathways of the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus were more readily visualized by high-resolution DTI than by conventional DTI. Among these, the fimbria of the fornix and the uncinate fasciculus adjacent to the temporal pole were identified more frequently by high-resolution DTI (visualization rate 83 and 100%, respectively) than by conventional DTI (visualization rate 63 and 83%, respectively) at a statistical significance of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Fractional anisotropy values in the fornix, cingulum, and uncinate fasciculus by high-resolution DTI were significantly higher than those by conventional DTI (P < 0.01); in contrast, the apparent diffusion coefficient values of all these fibers except that of the fornix remained unchanged between the two techniques.ConclusionThe 1.6-mm istropic voxel DTI at 3T is a feasible visualization tool and can improve the precision of tracking nerve bundles of the limbic system.

[1]  D. Parker,et al.  Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion‐tensor MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging fibre tracking using a front evolution algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Raichle,et al.  Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0‐T and 1.5‐T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  Takashi Inoue,et al.  Improved geometric distortion in coronal diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging using a whole-brain isotropic-voxel acquisition technique at 3 Tesla. , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[6]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  High-Resolution Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain Stem at 3 T , 2003 .

[7]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Comparison of single-shot echo-planar and line scan protocols for diffusion tensor imaging. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[8]  T. Naidich,et al.  Limbic connections. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  大内 宏之 Diffusion anisotropy measurement of brain white matter is affected by voxel size : underestimation occurs in areas with crossing fibers , 2007 .

[10]  T. Taoka,et al.  Diffusion anisotropy and diffusivity of white matter tracts within the temporal stem in Alzheimer disease: evaluation of the "tract of interest" by diffusion tensor tractography. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE‐DTI at 3 T , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Menelaos Malamas,et al.  Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity measurements on normal human brain: comparison between low- and high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging sequences , 2005, European Radiology.

[13]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[14]  Arvidas B Cheryauka,et al.  MRI diffusion tensor reconstruction with PROPELLER data acquisition. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  M. Chou,et al.  FLAIR diffusion-tensor MR tractography: comparison of fiber tracking with conventional imaging. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  K Togashi,et al.  Diffusion tensor fiber tractography of the optic radiation: analysis with 6-, 12-, 40-, and 81-directional motion-probing gradients, a preliminary study. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  L. Concha,et al.  Diffusion tensor tractography of the limbic system. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  High‐resolution isotropic 3D diffusion tensor imaging of the human brain , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. W. Papez A PROPOSED MECHANISM OF EMOTION , 1937 .

[21]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Spatial resolution dependence of DTI tractography in human occipito-callosal region , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  Luis Concha,et al.  Bilateral limbic diffusion abnormalities in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[23]  K. Homma,et al.  Diffusion-weighted three-dimensional MP-RAGE MR imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable time , 2002, Human brain mapping.