Finishing on time: When do predictions influence completion times?

People typically predict they will finish projects earlier than they do. Whereas previous research has examined the determinants of this prediction bias, the present research explored potential consequences for behavior. In particular, we examined whether and when task completion predictions influence actual completion times. In four experiments we used anchoring manipulations to induce participants to make relatively early or late task completion predictions, and then examined when they started and/or finished the target tasks. As hypothesized, the prediction manipulation influenced completion times under certain conditions defined by the nature of the target task. Manipulated predictions affected completion times of closed tasks, defined as tasks carried out within a single, continuous session but not of open tasks, defined as tasks requiring multiple work sessions. This implies that task completion predictions help to initiate action, but their impact diminishes over the course of extensive, multi-stage projects.

[1]  G. Fitzsimons,et al.  The Mere-Measurement Effect: Why Does Measuring Intentions Change Actual Behavior? , 2004 .

[2]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The Effects of Mindset on Behavior: Self-Regulation in Deliberative and Implemental Frames of Mind , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[4]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[5]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. , 1987 .

[6]  D. Ariely,et al.  Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment , 2002, Psychological science.

[7]  Z. Križan,et al.  The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  R. Buehler,et al.  Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. , 1994 .

[9]  Derek J. Koehler,et al.  People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  Jordan A. Litman,et al.  On the distinction between yuppies and hippies: Individual differences in prediction biases for planning future tasks , 2006 .

[11]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Subgoals as substitutes or complements: the role of goal accessibility. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[13]  Justin Kruger,et al.  If you don't want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy , 2004 .

[14]  S. Byram,et al.  Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction. , 1997 .

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[16]  Melissa J. Ferguson,et al.  The goal construct in social psychology. , 2007 .

[17]  R. Buehler,et al.  The Role of Motivated Reasoning in Optimistic Time Predictions , 1997 .

[18]  Sander L. Koole,et al.  Overcoming the planning fallacy through willpower : effects of implementation intentions on actual and predicted task-completion times , 2000 .

[19]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[20]  Paul W. Paese Effects of Framing on Actual Time Allocation Decisions , 1995 .

[21]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[22]  R. Buehler,et al.  Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions☆ , 2003 .

[23]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Anchors Distort Estimates of Expected Duration , 2005, Psychological reports.

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures , 1982 .

[25]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[27]  G. Fitzsimons,et al.  Asking questions can change choice behavior: does it do so automatically or effortfully? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  David Dunning,et al.  Prediction: The inside view. , 2007 .

[29]  Mark V. Pezzo,et al.  The social implications of planning: How public predictions bias future plans , 2006 .

[30]  Lawrence J. Sanna,et al.  The Hourglass Is Half Full or Half Empty: Temporal Framing and the Group Planning Fallacy. , 2005 .

[31]  C. Mckenzie,et al.  Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias? , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[33]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[34]  R. Buehler,et al.  Collaborative planning and prediction: Does group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation? , 2005 .

[35]  C. S. Poon,et al.  Self-predictions overweight strength of current intentions , 2006 .

[36]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Harnessing the imagination. Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[37]  Michael M Roy,et al.  Effect of task length on remembered and predicted duration , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  J. T. Austin,et al.  Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. , 1996 .

[39]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Exploring the time prediction process: the effects of task experience and complexity on prediction accuracy , 2003 .

[40]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior , 1993 .

[41]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[42]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[43]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Anchoring on the "here" and "now" in time and distance judgments. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  R. Buehler,et al.  Inside the planning fallacy: The causes and consequences of optimistic time predictions. , 2002 .

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[46]  Terry Connolly,et al.  Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks , 1997 .

[47]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice , 2005 .

[48]  S. Sherman On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. , 1980 .

[49]  V. Hinsz,et al.  Using Judgmental Anchors to Establish Challenging Self-Set Goals Without Jeopardizing Commitment , 1997 .

[50]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  The Short- and Long-Term Effects of Measuring Intent to Repurchase , 2004 .

[51]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .