Alternatives for current net metering policy for solar PV in the Netherlands: A comparison of impacts on business case and purchasing behaviour of private homeowners, and on governmental costs

Abstract To stimulate grid-connected solar PV systems on private dwellings, the Netherlands currently have a net metering policy, but questions have been raised on its continuation. In this study, several alternative policy options were assessed on the financial case for private homeowners investing in a PV system (simple payback time), on purchasing behaviour (using a technology adoption model), and on governmental costs. While continuation of net metering policy leads to ongoing improvement of the financial case up to levels that could be considered overstimulation, three policy alternatives can be set up so that they stabilise simple payback times of recent and future generations of PV systems. Under these alternative instruments, deployment of PV systems in this market segment is indicatively estimated to be 15–20% lower by the year 2030 than with continuation of net metering policy, while corresponding governmental cost reduction indications would be more than 50%. We conclude that from a cost effectiveness point of view there is reason to change to an alternative instrument. We did not find any decisive arguments pro or con either of the three alternative instruments, neither on the basis of the three main impacts analysed nor from other aspects reviewed more qualitatively.

[1]  Amanullah M. T. Oo,et al.  Comprehensive economic evaluations of a residential building with solar photovoltaic and battery energy storage systems: An Australian case study , 2017 .

[2]  Antonio Sanfilippo,et al.  Modeling residential adoption of solar energy in the Arabian Gulf Region , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[3]  P. Hammingh,et al.  Nationale Energieverkenning 2016 , 2016 .

[4]  J. Palm,et al.  Residential solar electricity adoption: how households in Sweden search for and use information , 2018 .

[5]  N. Meade,et al.  The impact of attribute preferences on adoption timing: The case of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells for household electricity generation , 2013 .

[6]  Wander Jager,et al.  Stimulating the diffusion of photovoltaic systems: A behavioural perspective , 2006 .

[7]  M. Ragwitz,et al.  Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? , 2011 .

[8]  Pranpreya Sriwannawit,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of photovoltaic systems: The state of the art , 2015 .

[9]  Marietta Briguglio,et al.  When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights , 2017 .

[10]  Teuvo Suntio,et al.  Grid-connected PV power plant induced power quality problems — Experimental evidence , 2016, 2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe).

[11]  Kimberly S. Wolske,et al.  Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories , 2017 .

[12]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Customer-economics of residential photovoltaic systems (Part 1): The impact of high renewable energy penetrations on electricity bill savings with net metering , 2014 .

[13]  A. Elkholy,et al.  Harmonics assessment and mathematical modeling of power quality parameters for low voltage grid connected photovoltaic systems , 2019, Solar Energy.

[14]  N. Darghouth,et al.  Net metering and market feedback loops: Exploring the impact of retail rate design on distributed PV deployment , 2015 .

[15]  Nasrudin Abd Rahim,et al.  A review on global solar energy policy , 2011 .

[16]  Mats Larsson,et al.  Global Energy Transformation , 2009 .

[17]  A. Hidalgo,et al.  Motivators for adoption of photovoltaic systems at grid parity: A case study from Southern Germany , 2015 .

[18]  L. Buys,et al.  Residential consumers’ experiences in the adoption and use of solar PV , 2017 .

[19]  R. Margolis,et al.  Overcoming barriers and uncertainties in the adoption of residential solar PV , 2016 .

[20]  Towhidul Islam,et al.  Household level innovation diffusion model of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells from stated preference data , 2014 .

[21]  Wilfried G.J.H.M. van Sark,et al.  A comparative review of building integrated photovoltaics ecosystems in selected European countries , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[22]  José L. Bernal-Agustín,et al.  A comparative assessment of net metering and net billing policies. Study cases for Spain , 2015 .

[23]  J. Palm Household installation of solar panels – Motives and barriers in a 10-year perspective , 2018 .

[24]  Véronique Vasseur,et al.  The adoption of PV in the Netherlands: A statistical analysis of adoption factors , 2015 .

[25]  Yoshihiro Yamamoto,et al.  Pricing electricity from residential photovoltaic systems: A comparison of feed-in tariffs, net metering, and net purchase and sale , 2012 .

[26]  Carol Atkinson-Palombo,et al.  Peer effects in the adoption of solar energy technologies in the United States: An urban case study , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[27]  Alvar Palm,et al.  Peer effects in residential solar photovoltaics adoption—A mixed methods study of Swedish users , 2017 .

[28]  Sanya Carley,et al.  Emerging Shadows in National Solar Policy? Nevada's Net Metering Transition in Context , 2017 .

[29]  Ulf J. J. Hahnel,et al.  Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners' expected personal gains and behavior of peers , 2015 .

[30]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Cost competitiveness of residential solar PV: The impact of net metering restrictions , 2017 .

[31]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .