Comparison of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures: Material Characterization and In Vivo Behavior

Detailed information about graft material characteristic is crucial to evaluate their clinical outcomes. The present study evaluates the physico-chemical characteristics of two xenografts manufactured on an industrial scale deproteinized at different temperatures (non-sintered and sintered) in accordance with a protocol previously used in sinus lift procedures. It compares how the physico-chemical properties influence the material’s performance in vivo by a histomorphometric study in retrieved bone biopsies following maxillary sinus augmentation in 10 clinical cases. An X-ray diffraction analysis revealed the typical structure of hydroxyapatite (HA) for both materials. Both xenografts were porous and exhibited intraparticle pores. Strong differences were observed in terms of porosity, crystallinity, and calcium/phosphate. Histomorphometric measurements on the bone biopsies showed statistically significant differences. The physic-chemical assessment of both xenografts, made in accordance with the protocol developed on an industrial scale, confirmed that these products present excellent biocompatibilitity, with similar characteristics to natural bone. The sintered HA xenografts exhibited greater osteoconductivity, but were not completely resorbable (30.80 ± 0.88% residual material). The non-sintered HA xenografts induced about 25.92 ± 1.61% of new bone and a high level of degradation after six months of implantation. Differences in the physico-chemical characteristics found between the two HA xenografts determined a different behavior for this material.

[1]  M. Janal,et al.  Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, Journal of periodontal research.

[2]  D. Rothamel,et al.  Histological and radiological evaluation of sintered and non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone substitute materials in sinus augmentation procedures. A prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical multicenter study , 2017, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  Jung‐Seok Lee,et al.  Randomized Clinical Trial of Maxillary Sinus Grafting using Deproteinized Porcine and Bovine Bone Mineral , 2017, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[4]  S. Wallace,et al.  A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. , 2016, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  S. Taschieri,et al.  Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  S. Ivanovski,et al.  A histomorphometric assessment of collagen-stabilized anorganic bovine bone mineral in maxillary sinus augmentation - a prospective clinical trial. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  The Effects of Crystal Phase and Particle Morphology of Calcium Phosphates on Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[8]  V. Olgac,et al.  Comparison of two different xenografts in bilateral sinus augmentation: radiographic and histologic findings. , 2015, Quintessence international.

[9]  M. Karl In vitro studies on CAD/CAM restorations fabricated with Procera technology: an overview. , 2015, Quintessence international.

[10]  J. McKittrick,et al.  Kinetic characterization of the deproteinization of trabecular and cortical bovine femur bones. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[11]  P. Coimbra,et al.  Comparison of a xenogeneic and an alloplastic material used in dental implants in terms of physico-chemical characteristics and in vivo inflammatory response. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[12]  Moustafa N. Aboushelib,et al.  Influence of Material Properties on Rate of Resorption of Two Bone Graft Materials after Sinus Lift Using Radiographic Assessment , 2012, International journal of dentistry.

[13]  G. Blunn,et al.  Effect of increased strut porosity of calcium phosphate bone graft substitute biomaterials on osteoinduction. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  U. Nannmark,et al.  Maxillary sinus augmentation using prehydrated corticocancellous porcine bone: hystomorphometric evaluation after 6 months. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[15]  H. Terheyden,et al.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  M. Barbeck,et al.  The chemical composition of synthetic bone substitutes influences tissue reactions in vivo: histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the cellular inflammatory response to hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics , 2012, Biomedical materials.

[17]  L. Rodella,et al.  Biomaterials in Maxillofacial Surgery: Membranes and Grafts , 2011, International journal of biomedical science : IJBS.

[18]  D. Kim,et al.  The clinical and histologic efficacy of xenograft granules for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. , 2011, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[19]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Maxillary sinus augmentation in humans using cortical porcine bone: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation after 4 and 6 months. , 2011, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[20]  N. Selvamurugan,et al.  Biocomposites containing natural polymers and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. , 2010, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[21]  E. Schulten,et al.  The use of Straumann Bone Ceramic in a maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure: a clinical, radiological, histological and histomorphometric evaluation with a 6-month healing period. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  Mohd Hamdi,et al.  The influence of sintering temperature on the properties of compacted bovine hydroxyapatite , 2009 .

[23]  F. A. Sheikh,et al.  Physiochemical characterizations of hydroxyapatite extracted from bovine bones by three different methods: extraction of biologically desirable Hap , 2008 .

[24]  Clemens A van Blitterswijk,et al.  Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite‐based bone graft substitutes , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  S. Pilathadka,et al.  Deproteinized bovine bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation surgery: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  F. Oktar,et al.  Effects of granule size on the osteoconductivity of bovine and synthetic hydroxyapatite: a histologic and histometric study in dogs. , 2007, The Journal of oral implantology.

[28]  A. Piattelli,et al.  A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone retrieved 9 years after a sinus augmentation procedure. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[29]  S. Caputi,et al.  Histologic and ultrastructural analysis of regenerated bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using a porcine bone-derived biomaterial. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[30]  Ralph Müller,et al.  In vivo behavior of calcium phosphate scaffolds with four different pore sizes. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[31]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[32]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Maxillary sinus augmentation with Bio-Oss particles: a light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy study in man. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[33]  J. Granjeiro,et al.  Physicochemical characterization of six commercial hydroxyapatites for medical-dental applicatons as bone graft. , 2005, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[34]  J. Ong,et al.  Protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell attachment to hydroxyapatite of different crystallinities. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[35]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[36]  L. Di Silvio,et al.  An ultrastructural study of cellular response to variation in porosity in phase‐pure hydroxyapatite , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[37]  M Epple,et al.  A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[38]  R Borojevic,et al.  Characterization of a bovine collagen-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[39]  Ji-Yeon Hong,et al.  Osteoblastic cell response to thin film of poorly crystalline calcium phosphate apatite formed at low temperatures. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[40]  A. Rossi,et al.  Dissolution properties of calcium phosphate granules with different compositions in simulated body fluid. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[41]  A. Rosa,et al.  Osseointegration and osseoconductivity of hydroxyapatite of different microporosities , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[42]  David Yu Sinus Floor Elevation Using Anorganic Bovine Bone Matrix (OsteoGraf/N) With and Without Autogenous Bone: A Clinical, Histologic, Radiographic, and Histomorphometric Analysis—Part 2 of an Ongoing Prospective Study , 2002 .

[43]  R. Legeros,et al.  Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[44]  B. Oesch,et al.  Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[45]  B. Nies,et al.  Chemical and physicochemical characterization of porous hydroxyapatite ceramics made of natural bone. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[46]  S. Ramesh,et al.  Effects of Sintering Temperature on the Properties of Hydroxyapatite , 2000 .

[47]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive ceramics: the effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[48]  S. Froum,et al.  Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N) with and without autogenous bone: a clinical, histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis--Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study. , 1998, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[49]  M. Urist,et al.  Bone: Formation by Autoinduction , 1965, Science.

[50]  C. Maiorana,et al.  Long-term survival rate of implants placed in conjunction with 246 sinus floor elevation procedures: results of a 15-year retrospective study. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[51]  P. Coulthard,et al.  Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. , 2010, European journal of oral implantology.

[52]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Histologic and elemental microanalytical study of anorganic bovine bone substitution following sinus floor augmentation in humans. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[53]  Hao Wang,et al.  The influence of pH and temperature on the morphology of hydroxyapatite synthesized by hydrothermal method , 2003 .

[54]  M. Urist Bone: formation by autoinduction. 1965. , 2002, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[55]  F. Bakker,et al.  Properties of calcium phosphate ceramics in relation to their in vivo behavior. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.