Electric shock hazard

A long-standing expert on electric-shock hazards summarizes the studies that determined the effective body impedance under varying conditions. He describes perception currents, reaction currents, let-go currents, and fibrillating currents. Turning to means for reducing low-voltage (120-240-volt) hazards, double insulation, shock limitation, isolation transformers, and the use of either high frequency or direct current are discussed for various environments. Macroshock is always a hazard in the home, in industry, and in the hospital. But the extreme vulnerability to microshock of patients with cardiac catheters, for example, requires special precautions in intensive-care and coronary-care units. Equipment such as the ground-fault interrupter (GFI) and a special isolation transformer are cited.

[1]  Gordon D. Friedlander Electricity in hospitals: elimination of lethal hazards , 1971, IEEE Spectrum.

[2]  C. F. Dalziel,et al.  Reevaluation of Lethal Electric Currents , 1968 .

[3]  Geddes La,et al.  Response to passage of electric current through the body. , 1971 .

[4]  Charles F. Dalziel,et al.  Effect of frequency on let-go currents , 1943, Electrical Engineering.

[5]  L A Geddes,et al.  Response to passage of electric current through the body. , 1971, JAAMI : journal of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.

[6]  Charles F. Dalziel,et al.  Transistorized ground-fault interrupter reduces shock hazard , 1970, IEEE Spectrum.

[7]  Charles F. Dalziel The Threshold of Perception Currents [includes discussion] , 1954, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[8]  C. F. Dalziel The threshold of perception currents , 1954, Electrical Engineering.