Solving hard stable matching problems involving groups of similar agents

Abstract Many important stable matching problems are known to be NP -hard, even when strong restrictions are placed on the input. In this paper we seek to identify structural properties of instances of stable matching problems which will allow us to design efficient algorithms using elementary techniques. We focus on the setting in which all agents involved in some matching problem can be partitioned into k different types, where the type of an agent determines his or her preferences, and agents have preferences over types (which may be refined by more detailed preferences within a single type). This situation would arise in practice if agents form preferences solely based on some small collection of agents' attributes. We also consider a generalisation in which each agent may consider some small collection of other agents to be exceptional, and rank these in a way that is not consistent with their types; this could happen in practice if agents have prior contact with a small number of candidates. We show that (for the case without exceptions), several well-studied NP -hard stable matching problems including Max SMTI (that of finding the maximum cardinality stable matching in an instance of stable marriage with ties and incomplete lists) belong to the parameterised complexity class FPT when parameterised by the number of different types of agents needed to describe the instance. For Max SMTI this tractability result can be extended to the setting in which each agent promotes at most one “exceptional” candidate to the top of his/her list (when preferences within types are not refined), but the problem remains NP -hard if preference lists can contain two or more exceptions and the exceptional candidates can be placed anywhere in the preference lists, even if the number of types is bounded by a constant.

[1]  David Manlove,et al.  Hard variants of stable marriage , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Hendrik W. Lenstra,et al.  Integer Programming with a Fixed Number of Variables , 1983, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Jörg Flum,et al.  Parameterized Complexity Theory , 2006, Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series.

[4]  Dana Randall,et al.  Sampling stable marriages: why spouse-swapping won't work , 2008, SODA '08.

[5]  David Manlove,et al.  The stable marriage problem with master preference lists , 2008, Discret. Appl. Math..

[6]  Saket Saurabh,et al.  On Treewidth and Stable Marriage , 2017, ArXiv.

[7]  Leslie Ann Goldberg,et al.  The complexity of approximately counting stable matchings , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  SangMok Lee,et al.  The Revealed Preference Theory of Stable and Extremal Stable Matchings , 2010 .

[9]  Michal Pilipczuk,et al.  Parameterized Algorithms , 2015, Springer International Publishing.

[10]  Gregg O'Malley,et al.  Algorithmic aspects of stable matching problems , 2007 .

[11]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[12]  Harel Yedidsion,et al.  How hard is it to satisfy (almost) all roommates? , 2017, ICALP.

[13]  A. Roth A natural experiment in the organization of entry-level labor markets: regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the United Kingdom. , 1991, The American economic review.

[14]  Haris Aziz,et al.  Complexity of coalition structure generation , 2011, AAMAS.

[15]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  On agent types in coalition formation problems , 2010, AAMAS.

[16]  James B. Orlin,et al.  Max flows in O(nm) time, or better , 2013, STOC '13.

[17]  András Frank,et al.  An application of simultaneous diophantine approximation in combinatorial optimization , 1987, Comb..

[18]  Saket Saurabh,et al.  Parameterized algorithms for stable matching with ties and incomplete lists , 2018, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[19]  Daniel Lokshtanov,et al.  Parameterized Integer Quadratic Programming: Variables and Coefficients , 2015, ArXiv.

[20]  David Manlove,et al.  "Almost Stable" Matchings in the Roommates Problem , 2005, WAOA.

[21]  Michael R. Fellows,et al.  Fundamentals of Parameterized Complexity , 2013 .

[22]  Saket Saurabh,et al.  Balanced Stable Marriage: How Close is Close Enough? , 2019, WADS.

[23]  Eytan Ronn,et al.  NP-Complete Stable Matching Problems , 1990, J. Algorithms.

[24]  A. Roth The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Leslie Ann Goldberg,et al.  The complexity of approximately counting stable roommate assignments , 2010, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[26]  David Manlove,et al.  Algorithmics of Matching Under Preferences , 2013, Bull. EATCS.

[27]  A. Siow,et al.  Who Marries Whom and Why , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Ravi Kannan,et al.  Minkowski's Convex Body Theorem and Integer Programming , 1987, Math. Oper. Res..

[29]  Shuichi Miyazaki,et al.  An improved approximation lower bound for finding almost stable maximum matchings , 2009, Inf. Process. Lett..

[30]  David Manlove,et al.  Stable Marriage with Incomplete Lists and Ties , 1999, ICALP.

[31]  David Manlove,et al.  Size Versus Stability in the Marriage Problem , 2010, WAOA.

[32]  L. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 1962 .

[33]  Matthias Mnich,et al.  Stable Marriage with Covering Constraints-A Complete Computational Trichotomy , 2016, SAGT.

[34]  A. Roth,et al.  Jumping the Gun: Imperfections and Institutions Related to the Timing of Market Transactions , 1994 .

[35]  Robert W. Irving,et al.  The Stable marriage problem - structure and algorithms , 1989, Foundations of computing series.

[36]  Dániel Marx,et al.  Parameterized Complexity and Local Search Approaches for the Stable Marriage Problem with Ties , 2009, Algorithmica.