Comparison of different control methods in switched reluctance drive system

Comparison of different torque control methods is presented in this paper, including current chopping control (CCC), torque sharing function (TSF) control and direct instantaneous torque control (DITC). These control methods play different roles in reducing torque ripples, increasing total output torque and getting maximum efficiency in different speed range.For example, DITC can reduce torque ripples at low speed obviously while it does not work out at high speed. TSF can reduce torque ripples efficiently at high speed but, in the meantime, it leads to total output torque decrease. CCC can output higher torque compared with previous two control methods, however its torque ripples is higher at high speed . In this paper, these three control methods are introduced and their performances are compared in terms of torque ripples and maximum output torque in order to further understand their inherent characteristics. Torque ripple-speed performance and the maximum output torque-speed performance of these control methods are obtained based on simulation results. Theoretical comparison and analysis brings us the guideline of how to select optimal control methods of SR drive system in different speed range for getting better output performance.

[1]  A. Chiba,et al.  Basic characteristics of 150,000r/min switched reluctance motor drive , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[2]  Jin-Woo Ahn,et al.  A Simple Nonlinear Logical Torque Sharing Function for Low-Torque Ripple SR Drive , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Huijun Wang,et al.  Torque ripple reduction of SRM using advanced direct instantaneous torque control scheme , 2007 .

[4]  R.B. Inderka,et al.  DITC-direct instantaneous torque control of switched reluctance drives , 2002, Conference Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 37th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.02CH37344).

[5]  Jin-Woo Ahn,et al.  Hybrid excitation of SRM for reduction of vibration and acoustic noise , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  H. Kuss,et al.  Design of a high speed Switched Reluctance Motor for spindle drive , 2007, 2007 Compatibility in Power Electronics.

[7]  Hideo Dohmeki,et al.  Characteristics of 4/2 Switched Reluctance Motor for a high speed drive by the excitation angle , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems.

[8]  S. Peresada,et al.  Feedback linearizing control of switched reluctance motors , 1987 .

[9]  K. Ohyama,et al.  Design using Finite Element Analysis of Switched Reluctance Motor for Electric Vehicle , 2006, 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies.

[10]  J. Corda,et al.  Variable-speed switched reluctance motors , 1980 .

[11]  I.R. Kartono,et al.  Dynamic simulation of maximizing the starting torque for super-high-speed drive of a 4/2 Switched Reluctance Motor , 2008, 2008 18th International Conference on Electrical Machines.