Predicting and Mapping Potential Whooping Crane Stopover Habitat to Guide Site Selection for Wind Energy Projects

Migratory stopover habitats are often not part of planning for conservation or new development projects. We identified potential stopover habitats within an avian migratory flyway and demonstrated how this information can guide the site-selection process for new development. We used the random forests modeling approach to map the distribution of predicted stopover habitat for the Whooping Crane (Grus americana), an endangered species whose migratory flyway overlaps with an area where wind energy development is expected to become increasingly important. We then used this information to identify areas for potential wind power development in a U.S. state within the flyway (Nebraska) that minimize conflicts between Whooping Crane stopover habitat and the development of clean, renewable energy sources. Up to 54% of our study area was predicted to be unsuitable as Whooping Crane stopover habitat and could be considered relatively low risk for conflicts between Whooping Cranes and wind energy development. We suggest that this type of analysis be incorporated into the habitat conservation planning process in areas where incidental take permits are being considered for Whooping Cranes or other species of concern. Field surveys should always be conducted prior to construction to verify model predictions and understand baseline conditions.

[1]  Integration of distance, direction and habitat into a predictive migratory movement model for blue-winged teal (Anas discors) , 2012 .

[2]  Jane E. Austin,et al.  A comprehensive review of observational and site evaluation data of migrant whooping cranes in the United States, 1943-1999 , 2001 .

[3]  John M. Morton,et al.  Using Random Forests to Provide Predicted Species Distribution Maps as a Metric for Ecological Inventory & Monitoring Programs , 2008, Applications of Computational Intelligence in Biology.

[4]  J. C. Lewis,et al.  MORTALITY IN FLEDGED WHOOPING CRANES OFTHE ARANSAS/WOOD BUFFALO POPULATION , 1992 .

[5]  Nils Warnock,et al.  Conserving migratory land birds in the new world: do we know enough? , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  D. Finch,et al.  Ecology and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds. , 1997 .

[7]  David A. Aborn,et al.  Mechanisms of en route habitat selection : How do migrants make habitat decisions during stopover? , 2000 .

[8]  Maureen Hand,et al.  Land Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States , 2009 .

[9]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[11]  R. Langston,et al.  Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds , 2006 .

[12]  A. Craig,et al.  Bird Migration: A General Survey , 2002 .

[13]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[14]  Richard T. Holmes,et al.  Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle , 2002 .

[15]  LEONARD A. BRENNAN,et al.  Wind Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation: Challenges and Opportunities , 2007 .

[16]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[17]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[18]  F. Moore,et al.  Migratory orientation of red-eyed vireos, Vireo olivaceus, in relation to energetic condition and ecological context , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  R. Pearson,et al.  Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar , 2006 .

[20]  J. Kelly,et al.  Landbird Migration in the American West: Recent Progress and Future Research Directions , 2009 .

[21]  Thomas V. Stehn,et al.  Whooping Crane Collisions with Power Lines: an Issue Paper , 2008 .

[22]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[23]  Thomas H. Kunz,et al.  Win-Win for Wind and Wildlife: A Vision to Facilitate Sustainable Development , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Katherine J. LaJeunesse Connette,et al.  Conservation Biology , 2009, The Quarterly review of biology.

[25]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[26]  Debra K. Meyer,et al.  Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992–2001 Land Cover Change Retrofit product , 2009 .

[27]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[28]  M. Patten,et al.  It's Not Easy Being Green: Wind Energy and a Declining Grassland Bird , 2009 .

[29]  Elizabeth A. Masden,et al.  Barriers to movement: impacts of wind farms on migrating birds , 2009 .

[30]  R. Anderson,et al.  Studying Wind Energy/Bird Interactions: A Guidance Document , 1999 .

[31]  Chao Chen,et al.  Using Random Forest to Learn Imbalanced Data , 2004 .

[32]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[33]  Howe Migration of radio-marked whooping cranes from the Aransas-wood buffalo population: Patterns of habitat use, behavior, and survival. Technical report , 1989 .

[34]  Á. Felicísimo,et al.  Profile or group discriminative techniques? Generating reliable species distribution models using pseudo‐absences and target‐group absences from natural history collections , 2010 .

[35]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? , 2012 .

[36]  Wallace P. Erickson,et al.  A summary and comparison of bird mortality from anthropogenic causes with an emphasis on collisions , 2005 .