Demonstration of Binaural Advantage in Audiometric Test Rooms

Binaural advantage was measured for 12 normally hearing subjects in a typical rectangular audiometric test room with a loudspeaker located in each corner. Four different loudspeaker configurations for presentation of signal and competition were evaluated. The results indicated that a configuration in which uncorrelated competition was delivered from both sides of the subject while the signal was presented from a 0 azimuth was the most resistant to interaural asymmetries resulting from the room geometry and produced the most consistent binaural advantages. Binaural advantage was then measured using this loudspeaker configuration for 15 hearing-impaired individuals wearing hearing aids. Although the group results indicated a mean unaided binaural advantage only slightly smaller than seen in the normal hearers, when hearing aids were worn an interaural asymmetry in a signal-to-competition ratio developed that reduced the clinical usefulness of the data for individuals. This outcome emphasizes that a valid clinical demonstration of binaural advantage is critically dependent on interauFal symmetry in signal-to-competition ratios for both aided and unaided tests. Such symmetry may be difficult to achieve in a typical audiometric test room.

[1]  R R Coles,et al.  Binaural advantages in hearing of speech , 1971, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[2]  W O Olsen,et al.  Hearing aid efficiency in a competing speech situation. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  D Byrne,et al.  The speech spectrum--some aspects of its significance for hearing aid selection and evaluation. , 1977, British journal of audiology.

[4]  E. Zelnick Comparison of Speech Perception Utilizing Monotic and Dichotic Modes of Listening , 1970 .

[5]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Hearing aid evaluation: reliability of repeated measurements. , 1960, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[6]  J. Pickett,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Samuel F. Lybarger,et al.  Binaural Hearing and Amplification. , 1981 .

[8]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[9]  R. Carhart,et al.  Monaural and Binaural Discrimination against Competing Sentences , 1965 .

[10]  J. Moncur,et al.  Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  D D Dirks,et al.  The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  A. Markides,et al.  Binaural hearing aids , 1977 .

[13]  L D HEDGECOCK,et al.  A comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aids for listening to speech. , 1958, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[14]  A. Thornton,et al.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.