The Punctum Fixum-Punctum Mobile Model: A Neuromuscular Principle for Efficient Movement Generation?

According to the “punctum fixum–punctum mobile model” that was introduced in prior studies, for generation of the most effective intentional acceleration of a body part the intersegmental neuromuscular onset succession has to spread successively from the rotation axis (punctum fixum) toward the body part that shall be accelerated (punctum mobile). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether this principle is, indeed, fundamental for any kind of efficient rotational accelerations in general, independent of the kind of movements, type of rotational axis, the current body position, or movement direction. Neuromuscular onset succession was captured by surface electromyography of relevant muscles of the anterior and posterior muscle chain in 16 high-level gymnasts during intentional accelerating movement phases while performing 18 different gymnastics elements (in various body positions to forward and backward, performed on high bar, parallel bars, rings and trampoline), as well as during non-sport specific pivot movements around the longitudinal axis. The succession patterns to generate the acceleration phases during these movements were described and statistically evaluated based on the onset time difference between the muscles of the corresponding muscle chain. In all the analyzed movement phases, the results clearly support the hypothesized succession pattern from punctum fixum to punctum mobile. This principle was further underlined by the finding that the succession patterns do change their direction running through the body when the rotational axis (punctum fixum) has been changed (e.g., high bar or rings [hands] vs. floor or trampoline [feet]). The findings improve our understanding of intersegmental neuromuscular coordination patterns to generate intentional movements most efficiently. This could help to develop more specific methods to facilitate such patterns in particular contexts, thus allowing for shorter motor learning procedures of context-specific key movement sequences in different disciplines of sports, as well as during non-sport specific movements.

[1]  A Arampatzis,et al.  Mechanical energetic processes during the giant swing exercise before dismounts and flight elements on the high bar and the uneven parallel bars. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Eye-Head Coordination , 2011 .

[3]  P. Komi.  Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Michael J. Hiley,et al.  The mechanics of the backward giant circle on the high bar , 2000 .

[5]  L R Bartlett,et al.  Measurement of upper extremity torque production and its relationship to throwing speed in the competitive athlete , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  Christoph von Laßberg,et al.  Neuromuscular onset succession of high level gymnasts during dynamic leg acceleration phases on high bar. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[7]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Models and Techniques in Computer Animation , 2014, Computer Animation Series.

[8]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Gareth Irwin,et al.  Inter-segmental coordination in progressions for the longswing on high bar , 2007, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  Vladimir Medved,et al.  Standards for Reporting EMG Data , 2000, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.

[11]  Beat Göpfert,et al.  Shoulder muscles recruitment during a power backward giant swing on high bar: a wavelet-EMG-analysis. , 2012, Human movement science.

[12]  François Hug,et al.  Can muscle coordination be precisely studied by surface electromyography? , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[13]  Joseph K. Kearney,et al.  Efficient Generation of Whip-Like Throwing and Striking Motions , 1993 .

[14]  Christoph von Laßberg,et al.  Intersegmental Eye-Head-Body Interactions during Complex Whole Body Movements , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Koichiro Murata,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of Backward Giant Swing on Parallel Bars , 2004 .

[16]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Biomechanics in Sport , 2000 .

[17]  J. Krug,et al.  Patterns of anterior and posterior muscle chain interactions during high performance long-hang elements in gymnastics. , 2014, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  A Arampatzis,et al.  Mechanical energetic processes during the giant swing before the Tkatchev exercise. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Gaze displacement and inter-segmental coordination during large whole body voluntary rotations , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Julien Frère,et al.  Between-subject variability of muscle synergies during a complex motor skill , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[22]  C Morriss,et al.  Biomechanical Factors Critical for Performance in the Men’s Javelin Throw , 1996, Sports medicine.

[23]  V Medved,et al.  Simple neuro-mechanical measure of the locomotor skill: an example of backward somersault. , 1995, Medical progress through technology.

[24]  B. Parratte,et al.  EFFECTS OF TWO DEVICES ON THE SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY RESPONSES OF ELEVEN SHOULDER MUSCLES DURING AZARIAN IN GYMNASTICS , 2006, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  K. Bartonietz.  Javelin Throwing: An Approach to Performance Development , 2008 .

[26]  Maurice R Yeadon,et al.  Is skilled technique characterized by high or low variability? An analysis of high bar giant circles. , 2013, Human movement science.