The road less travelled: morphology in the optimization of biped robot locomotion

Stable bipedal locomotion has been achieved using coupled evolution of morphology and control of a 5-link biped robot in a physics-based simulation environment. The robot was controlled by a closed loop recurrent neural network controller. The goal was to study the effect of macroscopic, midrange and microscopic changes in mass distribution along the biped skeleton to ascertain whether optimal morphology and control pairs could be discovered. The sensor-motor coupling determined that small changes in morphology manifest themselves as large changes in the performance of the biped, which were exploited by the optimization process. In this way, mechanical design and controller optimization were reduced to a single process, and more mutually optimized designs resulted. This work points to alternative routes for efficient automated and manual biped optimization.

[1]  Belgium , 1930 .

[2]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Building brains for bodies , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[4]  Karl Sims,et al.  Evolving 3d morphology and behavior by competition , 1994 .

[5]  John Hallam,et al.  A hybrid GP/GA approach for co-evolving controllers and robot bodies to achieve fitness-specified tasks , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Application of evolved locomotion controllers to a hexapod robot , 1996, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Stabilization control of biped locomotion robot based learning with GAs having self-adaptive mutation and recurrent neural networks , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Jerry Pratt,et al.  Exploiting Natural Dynamics in the Control of a Planar Bipedal Walking Robot , 1998 .

[9]  Bernard Espiau,et al.  A Study of the Passive Gait of a Compass-Like Biped Robot , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Walterio W. Mayol-Cuevas,et al.  Design of a walking machine structure using evolutionary strategies , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[11]  T. Takenaka,et al.  The development of Honda humanoid robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[12]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[13]  Olivier Chocron,et al.  Evolving walking robots for global task based design , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[14]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Bernard Espiau,et al.  The anthropomorphic biped robot BIP2000 , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[16]  Chandana Paul,et al.  Investigating Morphological Symmetry and Locomotive Efficiency using Virtual Embodied Evolution , 2000 .

[17]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Passive-Dynamic Walking Robot with Two Legs and Knees , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..