Research Note: Exaggeration Bias-Corrected Contingent Valuation Method: The Case of Olle Trail

Researchers have criticized the traditional contingent valuation method (CVM) due to its potential response bias. To address this bias, several studies have employed improved CVM survey designs. When respondents disguise the truth, non-sampling errors are created that cannot be corrected by these elaborate survey modifications. To reduce this type of non-sampling error, Park and MacLachlan (2008) suggested the exaggeration bias-corrected (EBC) CVM, which assumes a functional mechanism between real and spurious willingness to pay (WTP). The authors verify the effectiveness of the EBC-CVM in non-sampling error reduction, which in turn derives more error-corrected economic value. Few studies have employed the EBC-CVM in a tourism context. The main goals of this study are to introduce EBC-CVM and to test its validity in a tourism study. The results indicate that EBC-CVM contributes to the reduction of non-sampling errors. The implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  Choong‐Ki Lee,et al.  Estimating the value of preserving the Manchurian black bear using the contingent valuation method , 2008 .

[2]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  Estimating Willingness to Pay with Exaggeration Bias-Corrected Contingent Valuation Method , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[3]  Haemoon Oh,et al.  Psychological Ownership Theory: An Exploratory Application in the Restaurant Industry , 2008 .

[4]  D. Kgathi,et al.  Tourists’ perceptions and their willingness to pay for park fees: A case study of self-drive tourists and clients for mobile tour operators in Moremi Game Reserve, Botswana , 2007 .

[5]  Choong‐Ki Lee,et al.  Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: The case of the Korean DMZ , 2007 .

[6]  Choong‐Ki Lee,et al.  Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks’ tourism resources using a contingent valuation method , 2002 .

[7]  M Johannesson,et al.  Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment. , 2001, Journal of health economics.

[8]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions , 1998 .

[9]  I. Bateman,et al.  Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1997 .

[10]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[11]  I. Bateman,et al.  A multilevel modelling approach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation , 1996, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[12]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[13]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .

[14]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using contingent valuation to value environmental improvements , 1988 .