A motivational account of the undergraduate experience in science: brief measures of students’ self-system appraisals, engagement in coursework, and identity as a scientist

ABSTRACT As part of long-standing efforts to promote undergraduates’ success in science, researchers have investigated the instructional strategies and motivational factors that promote student learning and persistence in science coursework and majors. This study aimed to create a set of brief measures that educators and researchers can use as tools to examine the undergraduate motivational experience in science classes. To identify key motivational processes, we drew on self-determination theory (SDT), which holds that students have fundamental needs – to feel competent, related, and autonomous – that fuel their intrinsic motivation. When educational experiences meet these needs, students engage more energetically and learn more, cumulatively contributing to a positive identity as a scientist. Based on information provided by 1013 students from 8 classes in biology, chemistry, and physics, we constructed conceptually focused and psychometrically sound survey measures of three sets of motivational factors: (1) students’ appraisals of their own competence, autonomy, and relatedness; (2) the quality of students’ behavioural and emotional engagement in academic work; and (3) students’ emerging identities as scientists, including their science identity, purpose in science, and science career plans. Using an iterative confirmatory process, we tested short item sets for unidimensionality and internal consistency, and then cross-validated them. Tests of measurement invariance showed that scales were generally comparable across disciplines. Most importantly, scales and final course grades showed correlations consistent with predictions from SDT. These measures may provide a window on the student motivational experience for educators, researchers, and interventionists who aim to improve the quality of undergraduate science teaching and learning.

[1]  Francesco Maffioli,et al.  TREE : Teaching and research in engineering in Europe : re-engineering engineering education in Europe : SOCRATES Erasmus thematic network , 2007 .

[2]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Students’ Relationships with Teachers as Motivational Contexts , 2009 .

[3]  Ellen A. Skinner,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Engagement as “Active Ingredients” in Garden-Based Education: Examining Models and Measures Derived From Self-Determination Theory , 2012 .

[4]  W. Briggs,et al.  A Measure of College Student Course Engagement , 2005 .

[5]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding , 2008 .

[6]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Handbook of motivation at school , 2009 .

[7]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[8]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[9]  R. Little.  A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values , 1988 .

[10]  E. Skinner,et al.  A Common Measurement System for K-12 STEM education: Adopting an educational evaluation methodology that elevates theoretical foundations and systems thinking , 2014 .

[11]  T. Kindermann,et al.  A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection , 2009 .

[12]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Increasing the Use of Evidence‐Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies , 2014 .

[13]  Brent Bridgeman,et al.  Measuring Learning Outcomes in Higher Education , 2012 .

[14]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness , 2017 .

[15]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[16]  C. Stefanou,et al.  Self-regulation and autonomy in problem- and project-based learning environments , 2013 .

[17]  Lisa Tsui,et al.  Effective Strategies to Increase Diversity in STEM Fields: A Review of the Research Literature , 2007 .

[18]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[20]  Evelyne F. Vallières,et al.  The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education , 1992 .

[21]  M. J. Chang,et al.  Considering the Impact of Racial Stigmas and Science Identity: Persistence among Biomedical and Behavioral Science Aspirants , 2011, The Journal of higher education.

[22]  Kristy J. Lauver,et al.  Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  C. Bauer.  Beyond "Student Attitudes": Chemistry Self-Concept Inventory for Assessment of the Affective Component of Student Learning , 2005 .

[24]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Facilitating and hindering motivation, learning, and well-being in schools: Research and observations from Self-Determination Theory , 2016 .

[25]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[27]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[28]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Interpersonal Relationships, Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement: Yields for Theory, Current Issues, and Educational Practice , 2009 .

[29]  George D. Kuh.  What Student Engagement Data Tell Us about College Readiness , 2007 .

[30]  S. Christenson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Student Engagement , 2012 .

[31]  J. Connell,et al.  Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. , 1991 .

[32]  Lorelle L. Espinosa.  Pipelines and Pathways: Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors and the College Experiences That Contribute to Persistence , 2011 .

[33]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[34]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[35]  K. Wentzel,et al.  Peer Influence on Students’ Motivation, Academic Achievement, and Social Behavior , 2016 .

[36]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation With Nonscience Majors , 2009 .

[37]  Gita Taasoobshirazi,et al.  Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors , 2011 .

[38]  Brian P. Coppola,et al.  Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry , 2003 .

[39]  M. J. Chang,et al.  Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project , 2010 .

[40]  Heidi B. Carlone,et al.  Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. , 2007 .

[41]  J. Reeve.  A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement , 2012 .

[42]  Leonas Jovaiša.  The Attractiveness of Education , 2016 .

[43]  J. Reeve,et al.  Teachers’ estimates of their students’ motivation and engagement: being in synch with students , 2012 .

[44]  M. J. Chang,et al.  Making a Difference in Science Education , 2013, American educational research journal.

[45]  J. Connell,et al.  What It Takes to Do Well in School and Whether I've Got It: A Process Model of Perceived Control and Children's Engagement and Achievement in School , 1990 .

[46]  R. Coll,et al.  Development of Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). , 2003 .

[47]  Una Chi.  Classroom Engagement as a Proximal Lever for Student Success in Higher Education: What a Self- Determination Framework within a Multi-Level Developmental System Tells Us , 2014 .

[48]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Development of Achievement Motivation and Engagement , 2015 .

[49]  J. P. Mohsen,et al.  Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[50]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory , 2009 .

[51]  Maria K. DiBenedetto,et al.  Self-Efficacy Theory in Education , 2016 .

[52]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[53]  M. J. Chang,et al.  From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses , 2011, Research in higher education.

[54]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[55]  Ann Bessenbacher,et al.  Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self‐efficacy , 2013 .