Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been associated with improved quality of life and patient satisfaction with similar oncologic outcomes compared with traditional mastectomy techniques. By conserving the nipple-areola complex and the majority of the breast skin envelope, NSM allows for improved aesthetic outcomes after breast reconstruction. However, the technique is also associated with a steep learning curve that must be considered to achieve optimal outcomes. It is important that the plastic surgeon functions in concert with the extirpative breast surgeon to optimize outcomes because the reconstruction is ultimately dependent on the quality of the overlying mastectomy flaps. Various other factors influence the complex interplay between aesthetic and reconstructive outcomes in NSM, including preoperative evaluation, specific implant- and autologous-based considerations, as well as techniques to optimize and correct nipple-areola complex position. Management strategies for complications necessary to salvage a successful reconstruction are also reviewed. Lastly, techniques to expand indications for NSM and maximize nipple viability as well as preshape the breast are discussed. Through thoughtful preoperative planning and intraoperative technique, ideal aesthetic results in NSM may be achieved.

[1]  J. Frey,et al.  Putting Together the Pieces: Development and Validation of a Risk-Assessment Model for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2020, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Frey,et al.  "Does Staged Breast Reduction Prior to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Decrease Complications? A Matched Cohort Study Between Staged and Non-Staged Techniques." , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  J. Frey,et al.  Oncologic Trends, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Locoregional Recurrence: An Analysis of Tumor-to-Nipple Distance and Critical Factors in Therapeutic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  J. Frey,et al.  Optimizing Outcomes in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Mastectomy Flap Thickness Is Not One Size Fits All , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[5]  J. Frey,et al.  Incision Choices in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes and Evolution of a Clinical Algorithm , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  Caroline E. Jones,et al.  Evolution of Operative Technique for Mastectomy. , 2018, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[7]  Jeremie D. Oliver,et al.  Salvage of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies With Autologous Flaps , 2018, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[8]  J. Frey,et al.  The Impact of Mastectomy Weight on Reconstructive Trends and Outcomes in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Progressively Greater Complications with Larger Breast Size , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  E. Connolly,et al.  Expanding the Criteria for Nipple‐Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With Poor Prognostic Features , 2018, Clinical breast cancer.

[10]  John T. Stranix,et al.  Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Is There a Best Way? , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  T. Myckatyn,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes of Aesthetics and Satisfaction in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Implants and Fat Grafting , 2017, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[12]  Gedge D. Rosson,et al.  Quality-of-Life Outcomes Improve with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  J. Frey,et al.  Mastectomy Flap Thickness and Complications in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Objective Evaluation using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[14]  J. Frey,et al.  Nipple-Areola Complex Malposition in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Review of Risk Factors and Corrective Techniques from Greater than 1000 Reconstructions , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  M. Alperovich,et al.  Does Smoking History Confer a Higher Risk for Reconstructive Complications in Nipple‐Sparing Mastectomy? , 2017, The breast journal.

[16]  Briar L. Dent,et al.  Tumor-to-Nipple Distance as a Predictor of Nipple Involvement: Expanding the Inclusion Criteria for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  J. Frey,et al.  Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  Paul J. Therattil,et al.  Delay techniques for nipple-sparing mastectomy: A systematic review. , 2017, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[19]  J. Frey,et al.  The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Healing after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  M. Alperovich,et al.  “Breast in a Day”: Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  Baljit Singh,et al.  Nipple‐sparing Mastectomy and Sub‐areolar Biopsy: To Freeze or not to Freeze? Evaluating the Role of Sub‐areolar Intraoperative Frozen Section , 2016, The breast journal.

[22]  M. Alperovich,et al.  Oncologic outcomes after nipple‐sparing mastectomy: A single‐institution experience , 2016, Journal of surgical oncology.

[23]  S. Blankenship,et al.  Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Local Recurrence, and Nipple–Areolar Recurrence in the Setting of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  J. de Boniface,et al.  The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - a Swedish matched cohort study. , 2014, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  M. Alperovich,et al.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients with Prior Breast Irradiation: Are Patients at Higher Risk for Reconstructive Complications? , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Breast Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  V. Klimberg,et al.  Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[28]  G. Sgourakis,et al.  Comparison of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Non–Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[29]  J. Gatherwright,et al.  Patient Satisfaction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An 8-Year Outcome Study [Outcomes Article] , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[30]  A. Luini,et al.  Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  A. Luini,et al.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.