Abstract-A generalized lightning traveling-current-source return stroke model (GTCS) and the measurements of Miki et al. [J. Geophys. Res., vol. 107, no. D16, pp. ACL2.1-ACL2.11, 2002], are used to calculate the dynamics of a lightning channel corona sheath surrounding a thin channel core during the return stroke stage. The channel corona sheath model that predicts the charge motion in the corona sheath is used to determine the corona sheath dynamics. This model can be viewed as the generalization of the corona sheath model proposed by Maslowski and Rakov [J. Geophys. Res., vol. 111, D14110, pp. 1-16, 2006]. According to this model, the corona sheath surrounding the thin channel core consists of two zones containing charge, zone 1 (inner zone containing net positive charge) and zone 2 (zone containing negative charge surrounding zone 1), respectively, and an outer zone 3 surrounding zone 2 without charge. Theoretical expressions for the corona sheath radii and the velocities of both zones are derived. Using a theoretical expression for the radial electric field in the immediate vicinity of the channel core derived for the GTCS model and the measured electric field waveforms of Miki et al. [J. Geophys. Res., vol. 107, no. D16, pp. ACL2.1-ACL2.11, 2002], the channel discharge function versus time is calculated. Based on this function and the measured channel-base current function, the corona sheath radii of both zones and their velocities versus time in the bottom portion of the channel are calculated. It is shown that the maximum radii of zones 1 and 2 at 2 m above ground are less than 1.5 and 6 cm, respectively. Corresponding maximum radial corona sheath velocities are less than 6 × 104 m/s. Small values of the maximum radii of zones 1 and 2 can be explained by the small value of the channel line charge density of 6.7 μC/m, due to vicinity of perfect ground. Using measured channel-base current and the calculated channel discharge function, the line charge distribution versus height is calculated. The current reflections from the striking point are considered. For the ground current reflection factor R = 1 (the reflection from the perfectly conducting ground) the peak value of the channel line charge density is 0.75 mC/m at the height of about 12 m above ground and for R = 0 (no current reflections) the peak value is 1.3 mC/m, at about 17 m above ground. The corresponding calculated values of the return stroke velocities in the channel bottom are 1.29 × 108 m/s (0.43c) and 1.68 × 108 m/s (0.56c), respectively. The corona sheath expansion velocity is about three orders of magnitude less than the calculated lightning return stroke velocity. The result concerning the channel line charge distribution is in the agreement with the measurements of Crawford et al. [J. Geophys. Res., vol. 106, pp. 14909-14917, 2001], whereas the calculated return stroke velocities are in a good agreement with the optical measurements of Willet et al. [J. Geophys. Res., vol. 93, pp. 3867-3878, 1988] and [J. Geophys. Res., vol. 94, pp. 1327513286,1989].
[1]
Torsten Fehr,et al.
Book Review: Rakov, V. A., M. A. Uman: Lightning: Physics and Effects. - Cambridge Univ. Press
,
2005
.
[2]
Dynamics of Lightning Discharge During Return Stroke
,
2007,
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.
[3]
R. F. Griffiths,et al.
The effects of air pressure and water vapour content on the propagation of positive corona streamers, and their implications to lightning initiation
,
1976
.
[4]
Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.
Electric fields near triggered lightning channels measured with Pockels sensors
,
2002
.
[5]
Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.
Test of the transmission line model and the traveling current source model with triggered lightning return strokes at very close range
,
2002
.
[6]
M. Ianoz,et al.
Lightning-induced voltages on overhead lines
,
1993
.
[7]
J. C. Willett,et al.
Submicrosecond intercomparison of radiation fields and currents in triggered lightning return strokes based on the transmission-line model
,
1989
.
[8]
E. Williams,et al.
Corona envelopes and lightning currents
,
1989
.
[9]
M. Uman,et al.
The Lightning Discharge
,
1987
.
[10]
Gerhard Diendorfer,et al.
An improved return stroke model with specified channel-base current
,
1990
.
[11]
Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.
The close lightning electromagnetic environment: Dart‐leader electric field change versus distance
,
2001
.
[12]
V. Rakov,et al.
A study of the lightning channel corona sheath
,
2006
.
[14]
Carl E. Baum,et al.
Analytic Return-Stroke Transmission-Line Model
,
1987
.
[15]
V. Rakov,et al.
Triggered-lightning properties inferred from measured currents and very close electric fields
,
2005
.
[16]
J. R. Grant,et al.
Characterization of Lightning Return Stroke Electric and Magnetic Fields From Simultaneous Two- Station Measurements (Paper 9C0949)
,
1979
.
[17]
Martin A. Uman,et al.
Lightning return stroke model with height‐variable discharge time constant
,
1994
.
[18]
Richard E. Orville,et al.
An experimental test of the 'transmission-line model' of electromagnetic radiation from triggered lightning return strokes
,
1988
.
[19]
Basil Ferdinand Jamieson Schonland,et al.
Progressive Lightning. V. A Comparison of Photographic and Electrical Studies of the Discharge Process
,
1938
.
[20]
Conductivity of a Lightning-Channel Corona Sheath During Return Stroke
,
2009,
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.
[21]
Fridolin Heidler,et al.
Calculation of lightning current parameters
,
1999
.
[22]
V. Rakov,et al.
Correlated time derivatives of current, electric field intensity, and magnetic flux density for triggered lightning at 15 m
,
2002
.
[23]
P. Osmokrovic,et al.
Extension of lightning corona sheath model during return stroke
,
2011,
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.