Climate-based empirical models show biased predictions of butterfly communities along environmental gradients

A better understanding of the factors that mould ecological community structure is required to accurately predict community composition and to anticipate threats to ecosystems due to global changes. We tested how well stacked climate-based species distribution models (S-SDMs) could predict butterfly communities in a mountain region. It has been suggested that climate is the main force driving butterfly distribution and community structure in mountain environments, and that, as a consequence, climate-based S-SDMs should yield unbiased predictions. In contrast to this expectation, at lower altitudes, climate-based S-SDMs overpredicted butterfly species richness at sites with low plant species richness and underpredicted species richness at sites with high plant species richness. According to two indices of composition accuracy, the Sorensen index and a matching coefficient considering both absences and presences, S-SDMs were more accurate in plant-rich grasslands. Butterflies display strong and often specialised trophic interactions with plants. At lower altitudes, where land use is more intense, considering climate alone without accounting for land use influences on grassland plant richness leads to erroneous predictions of butterfly presences and absences. In contrast, at higher altitudes, where climate is the main force filtering communities, there were fewer differences between observed and predicted butterfly richness. At high altitudes, even if stochastic processes decrease the accuracy of predictions of presence, climate-based S-SDMs are able to better filter out butterfly species that are unable to cope with severe climatic conditions, providing more accurate predictions of absences. Our results suggest that predictions should account for plants in disturbed habitats at lower altitudes but that stochastic processes and heterogeneity at high altitudes may limit prediction success of climate-based S-SDMs.

[1]  A. Guisan,et al.  Predicting spatial patterns of plant species richness: a comparison of direct macroecological and species stacking modelling approaches , 2011 .

[2]  L. Maiorano,et al.  The future of terrestrial mammals in the Mediterranean basin under climate change , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Hanspach,et al.  Geographical patterns in prediction errors of species distribution models , 2011 .

[4]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  SESAM – a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio‐temporal patterns of species assemblages , 2011 .

[5]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Determinants of species richness in generalist and specialist Mediterranean butterflies: the negative synergistic forces of climate and habitat change , 2011 .

[6]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance , 2011 .

[7]  J. Lobo,et al.  How well does presence‐only‐based species distribution modelling predict assemblage diversity? A case study of the Tenerife flora , 2011 .

[8]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Impacts of climate change on Swiss biodiversity: An indicator taxa approach , 2011 .

[9]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Species distribution models reveal apparent competitive and facilitative effects of a dominant species on the distribution of tundra plants , 2010 .

[10]  Miguel B. Araújo,et al.  Do community‐level models describe community variation effectively? , 2010 .

[11]  Johan Ekroos,et al.  Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes , 2010 .

[12]  D. Gutiérrez,et al.  The contributions of topoclimate and land cover to species distributions and abundance: fine-resolution tests for a mountain butterfly fauna , 2010 .

[13]  J. Lobo,et al.  Deriving the Species Richness Distribution of Geotrupinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in Mexico from the Overlap of Individual Model Predictions , 2010, Environmental entomology.

[14]  P. Vittoz,et al.  Land use improves spatial predictions of mountain plant abundance but not presence-absence , 2009 .

[15]  M. Araújo,et al.  BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions , 2009 .

[16]  M. Luoto,et al.  Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies , 2009 .

[17]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling , 2009 .

[18]  Eduardo Pineda,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. , 2008, Ecology.

[20]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity , 2008 .

[21]  R. Merrill,et al.  Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  Maj Rundlöf,et al.  Local and landscape effects of organic farming on butterfly species richness and abundance , 2007 .

[23]  M. Araújo,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change , 2007 .

[24]  J. Blackard,et al.  Journal of Applied , 2006 .

[25]  Richard Fox,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of climate and habitat factors on butterfly diversity. , 2007, Ecology.

[26]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  J. Kerr,et al.  Contrasting spatial and temporal global change impacts on butterfly species richness during the 20th century , 2006 .

[29]  Chris van Swaay,et al.  Biotope Use and Trends of European Butterflies , 2006, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[30]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[31]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[32]  M. Kitahara,et al.  Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: An analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. Specialist strategies , 1994, Researches on Population Ecology.

[33]  M. Sykes,et al.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Askling,et al.  Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region , 2004 .

[35]  S. Herrando,et al.  Butterfly species richness in the north‐west Mediterranean Basin: the role of natural and human‐induced factors , 2004 .

[36]  C. Stevens,et al.  Impact of Nitrogen Deposition on the Species Richness of Grasslands , 2004, Science.

[37]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[38]  R. Menéndez,et al.  Stability of butterfly assemblages in relation to the level of numerical resolution and altitude , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[39]  B. A. Hawkins,et al.  Water–energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies , 2003 .

[40]  Eric E. Porter,et al.  Does Herbivore Diversity Depend on Plant Diversity? The Case of California Butterflies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[41]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling , 2002 .

[42]  J. Kerr,et al.  Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[44]  G. Cumming Using habitat models to map diversity: pan‐African species richness of ticks (Acari: Ixodida) , 2000 .

[45]  R. Dennis,et al.  Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas , 1999 .

[46]  D. Pearson,et al.  The influence of spatial scale on cross‐taxon congruence patterns and prediction accuracy of species richness , 1999 .

[47]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Predictive mapping of alpine grasslands in Switzerland: Species versus community approach , 1999 .

[48]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Modelling Topographic Variation in Solar Radiation in a GIS Environment , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[49]  C. Boggs,et al.  Community Composition in Mountain Ecosystems: Climatic Determinants of Montane Butterfly Distributions , 1997 .

[50]  M. Morris,et al.  Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation , 1993 .

[51]  S. Pickett,et al.  The Application of the Ecological Gradient Paradigm to the Study of Urban Effects , 1993 .

[52]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global biodiversity , 1992 .

[53]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[54]  J. Turner,et al.  Does Solar Energy Control Organic Diversity? Butterflies, Moths and the British Climate , 1987 .

[55]  P. Raven,et al.  BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION , 1964 .