Efficient non‐linear model reduction via a least‐squares Petrov–Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations

A Petrov–Galerkin projection method is proposed for reducing the dimension of a discrete non‐linear static or dynamic computational model in view of enabling its processing in real time. The right reduced‐order basis is chosen to be invariant and is constructed using the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition method. The left reduced‐order basis is selected to minimize the two‐norm of the residual arising at each Newton iteration. Thus, this basis is iteration‐dependent, enables capturing of non‐linearities, and leads to the globally convergent Gauss–Newton method. To avoid the significant computational cost of assembling the reduced‐order operators, the residual and action of the Jacobian on the right reduced‐order basis are each approximated by the product of an invariant, large‐scale matrix, and an iteration‐dependent, smaller one. The invariant matrix is computed using a data compression procedure that meets proposed consistency requirements. The iteration‐dependent matrix is computed to enable the least‐squares reconstruction of some entries of the approximated quantities. The results obtained for the solution of a turbulent flow problem and several non‐linear structural dynamics problems highlight the merit of the proposed consistency requirements. They also demonstrate the potential of this method to significantly reduce the computational cost associated with high‐dimensional non‐linear models while retaining their accuracy. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  B. R. Noack Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 2013 .

[2]  Robert H. Halstead,et al.  Matrix Computations , 2011, Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing.

[3]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  Discrete Empirical Interpolation for nonlinear model reduction , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[4]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A method for interpolating on manifolds structural dynamics reduced‐order models , 2009 .

[5]  David Galbally,et al.  Non‐linear model reduction for uncertainty quantification in large‐scale inverse problems , 2009 .

[6]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A space–time discontinuous Galerkin method for the solution of the wave equation in the time domain , 2009 .

[7]  J. Peraire,et al.  An efficient reduced‐order modeling approach for non‐linear parametrized partial differential equations , 2008 .

[8]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Model Reduction for Large-Scale Systems with High-Dimensional Parametric Input Space , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  C. Farhat,et al.  Interpolation Method for Adapting Reduced-Order Models and Application to Aeroelasticity , 2008 .

[10]  Robert Schaefer,et al.  Mechanical Models of Artery Walls , 2008 .

[11]  Siep Weiland,et al.  Missing Point Estimation in Models Described by Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  A. Patera,et al.  Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations , 2007 .

[13]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Adaptation of Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Models and Application to an F-16 Configuration , 2007 .

[14]  N. Nguyen,et al.  EFFICIENT REDUCED-BASIS TREATMENT OF NONAFFINE AND NONLINEAR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 2007 .

[15]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  10. Certified Rapid Solution of Partial Differential Equations for Real-Time Parameter Estimation and Optimization , 2007 .

[16]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Reduced-order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration , 2006 .

[17]  Robert Haimes,et al.  Strategies for Multifidelity Optimization with Variable-Dimensional Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[18]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Aeroelastic Model Reduction for Affordable Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Flutter Analysis , 2005 .

[19]  L. Cordier,et al.  Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model , 2005 .

[20]  G. Kerschen,et al.  The Method of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for Dynamical Characterization and Order Reduction of Mechanical Systems: An Overview , 2005 .

[21]  Athanasios C. Antoulas,et al.  Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems , 2005, Advances in Design and Control.

[22]  A. Patera,et al.  Certified real‐time solution of the parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations: rigorous reduced‐basis a posteriori error bounds , 2005 .

[23]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[24]  Nguyen Ngoc Cuong,et al.  Certified Real-Time Solution of Parametrized Partial Differential Equations , 2005 .

[25]  N. Nguyen,et al.  An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations , 2004 .

[26]  Daniele Venturi,et al.  Gappy data and reconstruction procedures for flow past a cylinder , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  K. Willcox Unsteady Flow Sensing and Estimation via the Gappy Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2004 .

[28]  R. Murray,et al.  Model reduction for compressible flows using POD and Galerkin projection , 2004 .

[29]  Lars Davidson,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF THE FLOW AROUND AN AHMED BODY , 2004 .

[30]  X. Bombois,et al.  Accelerating large-scale non-linear models for monitoring and control using spatial and temporal correlations , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[31]  K. Willcox,et al.  Aerodynamic Data Reconstruction and Inverse Design Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2004 .

[32]  D. Rovas,et al.  A Posteriori Error Bounds for Reduced-Basis Approximation of Parametrized Noncoercive and Nonlinear Elliptic Partial Differential Equations , 2003 .

[33]  M. P. Païdoussis,et al.  Reduced-order models for nonlinear vibrations of cylindrical shells via the proper orthogonal decomposition method , 2003 .

[34]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition extensions for parametric applications in compressible aerodynamics , 2003 .

[35]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery , 2003 .

[36]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[37]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  A New Look at Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2003, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[38]  B. Feeny,et al.  Enhanced Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for the Modal Analysis of Homogeneous Structures , 2002 .

[39]  J. Peraire,et al.  Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2002 .

[40]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Transonic Aeroelasticity Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Reduced-Order Models , 2001 .

[41]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[42]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Airfoil design optimization using reduced order models based on proper orthogonal decomposition , 2000 .

[43]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[44]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency-domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique , 1999 .

[45]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  Karhunen–Loève procedure for gappy data , 1995 .

[46]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[47]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. II. Symmetries and transformations , 1987 .

[48]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[49]  Gunther Ramm,et al.  Some salient features of the time - averaged ground vehicle wake , 1984 .