Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Information

Attribute information is not always readily available to consumers. This is especially true for ethical attributes, such as labor practices, environmental friendliness, and so forth. Intuitively, it might be expected that consumers who would use an attribute in their decision making should seek attribute information, especially if it is easily obtainable. In three studies, the authors measure discrepancies between requests for available ethical attribute information and actual use of the same attribute in a conjoint task. In both between-subjects and within-subjects designs, the authors show that consumers (1) underrequest ethical attribute information and (2) are especially likely to show request/use inconsistency if they care about the underlying ethical issue. Negative emotions, especially the avoidance of anger, appear to drive this willful ignorance. These results add to the growing literature on avoidance mechanisms and consumer decision making and may shed light on when ethical attributes do (and do not) play a role in actual purchase behavior.

[1]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Understanding High-Stakes Consumer Decisions: Mammography Adherence Following False-Alarm Test Results , 2003 .

[2]  C. Batson,et al.  Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  G. McClelland,et al.  Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2001 .

[4]  J. Struewing,et al.  Psychosocial factors predicting BRCA1/BRCA2 testing decisions in members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[5]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  J. Payne,et al.  Coping with Unfavorable Attribute Values in Choice. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[7]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[8]  M. Bazerman,et al.  negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences , 1998 .

[9]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[10]  L. Katz Ill-Gotten Gains: Evasion, Blackmail, Fraud, and Kindred Puzzles of the Law , 1996 .

[11]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome Knowledge, Regret, and Omission Bias , 1995 .

[12]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Buying/Selling Price Preference Reversals: Preference for Environmental Changes in Buying Versus Selling Modes , 1994 .

[13]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[14]  J. Payne,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 2006 .

[15]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Forecasting with Conjoint Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  J. Baron,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2001 .

[17]  M. Strahilevitz The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand , 1999 .

[18]  J. Baron,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High-Stakes Decisions , 1995 .

[19]  R. Hogarth Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1980 .