Providing Choice Making Opportunities Within and Between Daily School Routines

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of providing choice making opportunities, embedded within and between daily school routine activities, on the frequency of protests and task initiations exhibited by a student with a severe intellectual disability. An ABABC single-subject design was used to evaluate the effects of choice making opportunities embedded within and between three daily routine activities. During phase A, the classroom staff directed the student's participation without providing choice making opportunities within the activities. In phase B, staff provided choice making opportunities embedded within steps of each activity. Phase C extended choice making opportunities by providing the participant with a choice between activities as well as within the steps of the activities after it was noted that the first step of beginning the activities occasioned more protests than the other steps. The results of this study replicate earlier research showing that embedded choice making opportunities within routines reduced protests and increased task initiations. The addition of choice making opportunities between activities during phase C further reduced the incidents of protests.

[1]  N. Zollers,et al.  Daily decision-making in community residences: a social comparison of adults with and without mental retardation. , 1988, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[2]  M. B. Parsons,et al.  Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  L. Bambara,et al.  Embedding Choice in the Context of Daily Routines: An Experimental Case Study , 1995 .

[4]  F. Brown Creative Daily Scheduling: A Nonintrusive Approach to Challenging Behaviors in Community Residences , 1991 .

[5]  R. Albin,et al.  Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior: A Practical Assessment Guide , 1993 .

[6]  E. Kozleski,et al.  Quality of Life Differences between Adults with and without Disabilities , 1994 .

[7]  D. Guess,et al.  Concepts and Issues Related to Choice-Making and Autonomy among Persons with Severe Disabilities , 1985 .

[8]  Karen A. Berkman,et al.  Alternative Strategies and Multiple Outcomes in the Remediation of Severe Self-Injury: Going “All Out” Nonaversively , 1988 .

[9]  D. Gast,et al.  Single Subject Research in Special Education , 1984 .

[10]  M. Yap,et al.  Decision-making by community residents with an intellectual disability , 1992 .

[11]  I. M. Evans,et al.  Nonaversive Intervention for Behavior Problems: A Manual for Home and Community , 1989 .

[12]  G. Dunlap,et al.  Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  E. Carr,et al.  Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach. , 1993, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  M. Shevin,et al.  The Importance of Choice-Making Skills for Students with Severe Disabilities , 1984 .

[15]  L. Foster-Johnson,et al.  Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  J. Dattilo,et al.  Effects of Choice on Leisure Participation for Persons with Severe Handicaps , 1985 .

[17]  V. Durand Severe Behavior Problems: A Functional Communication Training Approach , 1990 .

[18]  J. Sherman,et al.  Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: the rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  G. Dunlap,et al.  Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  G E Lancioni,et al.  A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities. , 1996, Research in developmental disabilities.

[21]  Glen Dunlap,et al.  The effects of choice-making on the problem behaviors of high school students with intellectual disabilities , 1996 .

[22]  D. Guess,et al.  Opportunities to Express Preferences and Make Choices among Students with Severe Disabilities in Classroom Settings , 1987 .

[23]  L. Bambara,et al.  The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[24]  F. Brown,et al.  Choice Diversity for People with Severe Disabilities. , 1993 .