Design and implementation of a system for treating paediatric patients with stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) allows the delivery of highly conformal dose distributions to localised brain tumours. This is of particular importance for children, whose often excellent long-term prognosis should be accompanied by low toxicity. The commercial immobilisation system in use at our hospital for adults was felt to be too heavy for children, and precluded the use of anaesthesia, which is sometimes required for paediatric patients. This paper therefore describes the design and implementation of a system for treating children with SCRT. This system needed to be well tolerated by patients, with good access for treating typical childhood malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A lightweight frame was developed for immobilisation, with a shell-based alternative for patients requiring general anaesthetic. Procedures were set up to introduce the patients to the frame system in order to maximise patient co-operation and comfort. Film measurements were made to assess the impact of the frame on transmission and surface dose. The reproducibility of the systems was assessed using electronic portal images. RESULTS Both frame and shell systems are in clinical use. The frame weighs 0.6 kg and is well tolerated. It has a transmission of 92-96%, and fields which pass through it deliver surface doses of 58-82% of the dose at d(max), compared to 18% when no frame is present. However, the frame is constructed to maximise the availability of unobstructed beam directions. Reproducibility measurements for the frame showed a mean random error of 1.0+/-0.2mm in two dimensions (2D) and 1.4+/-0.7 mm in 3D. The mean systematic error in 3D was 2.2mm, and 90% of all overall 3D errors were less than 3.4mm. For the shell system, the mean 2D random error was 1.5+/-0.2mm. CONCLUSIONS Two well-tolerated immobilisation devices have been developed for fractionated SCRT treatment of paediatric patients. A lightweight frame system gives a wide range of possible unobstructed beam directions, although beams that intersect the frame are not precluded, provided that output corrections are applied. A shell system allows the use of general anaesthesia. Both systems give reproducible immobilisation to complement the high-precision treatment delivery.

[1]  Y. Zhu,et al.  Comparison of two immobilization techniques using portal film and digitally reconstructed radiographs for pediatric patients with brain tumors. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M I Hariz,et al.  Reproducibility of repeated mountings of a noninvasive CT/MRI stereoadapter. , 1986, Applied neurophysiology.

[3]  A P Warrington,et al.  Relocatable frame for stereotactic external beam radiotherapy. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  R Bale,et al.  Repositioning accuracy: comparison of a noninvasive head holder with thermoplastic mask for fractionated radiotherapy and a case report. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  A P Warrington,et al.  Quality assurance in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  A. Nahum,et al.  A comparison of techniques for stereotactic radiotherapy by linear accelerator based on 3-dimensional dose distributions. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  G T Chen,et al.  Comparison of static conformal field with multiple noncoplanar arc techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  L B Marks,et al.  Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or noncoplanar radiation beam bouquets: a possible alternative to radiosurgery. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  H. Kooy,et al.  Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Stanley J. Rosenthal,et al.  A precision cranial immobilization system for conformal stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  M Bellerive,et al.  Adaptation and verification of the relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame in stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  B. Fallone,et al.  Frame slippage verification in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Tsai,et al.  A non-invasive immobilization system and related quality assurance for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy of intracranial and head and neck disease. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R. Laing,et al.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of irregular targets: a comparison between static conformal beams and non-coplanar arcs. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. , 1996, Medical physics.

[16]  O A Mendiondo,et al.  A precision repeat localization head frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1997, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[17]  H. Kubo,et al.  A comparison of arc-based and static mini-multileaf collimator-based radiosurgery treatment plans. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Michael Brada,et al.  A non-invasive, relocatable stereotactic frame for fractionated radiotherapy and multiple imaging. , 1991 .

[19]  H. Kooy,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional correlation of CT-CT, CT-MRI, and CT-SPECT using chamfer matching. , 1994, Medical physics.

[20]  A new non-invasive and relocatable immobilization frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  J. Bourland,et al.  Static field conformal stereotactic radiosurgery: physical techniques. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  W Schlegel,et al.  Stereotactically guided fractionated radiotherapy: technical aspects. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  A P Warrington,et al.  Optimization of stereotactically-guided conformal treatment planning of sellar and parasellar tumors, based on normal brain dose volume histograms. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.