Reliability of computer-assisted periacetabular osteotomy using a minimally invasive approach

BackgroundPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice for younger patients with developmental hip dysplasia. The procedure aims to normalize the joint configuration, reduce the peak-pressure, and delay the development of osteoarthritis. The procedure is technically demanding and no previous study has validated the use of computer navigation with a minimally invasive transsartorial approach.MethodsComputer-assisted PAO was performed on ten patients. Patients underwent pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning with a standardized protocol. Preoperative preparation consisted of outlining the lunate surface and segmenting the pelvis and femur from CT data. The Biomechanical Guidance System was used intra-operatively to automatically calculate diagnostic angles and peak-pressure measurements. Manual diagnostic angle measurements were performed based on pre- and postoperative CT. Differences in angle measurements were investigated with summary statistics, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland–Altman plots. The percentage postoperative change in peak-pressure was calculated.ResultsIntra-operative reported angle measurements show a good agreement with manual angle measurements with intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.94 and 0.98. Computer navigation reported angle measurements were significantly higher for the posterior sector angle ($$1.65^{\circ }$$1.65∘, $$p=0.001$$p=0.001) and the acetabular anteversion angle ($$1.24^{\circ }$$1.24∘, $$p=0.004$$p=0.004). No significant difference was found for the center-edge ($$p=0.056$$p=0.056), acetabular index ($$p=0.212$$p=0.212), and anterior sector angle ($$p=0.452$$p=0.452). Peak-pressure after PAO decreased by a mean of 13% and was significantly different ($$p=0.008$$p=0.008).ConclusionsWe found that computer navigation can reliably be used with a minimally invasive transsartorial approach PAO. Angle measurements generally agree with manual measurements and peak-pressure was shown to decrease postoperatively. With further development, the system will become a valuable tool in the operating room for both experienced and less experienced surgeons performing PAO. Further studies with a larger cohort and follow-up will allow us to investigate the association with peak-pressure and postoperative outcome and pave the way to clinical introduction.