Back to the Basics: Trends in and Role Determinants of Women's Attitudes toward Housework.

Missing from the expanding literature on the division of household labor and perceptions of equity is an understanding of basic attitudes toward housework. We examine whether changes in women's roles have been accompanied by a psychological disinvestment in housework (e.g., in standards) over time. Such a change might speak to the relatively little distress noted by researchers when husbands contribute minimally. We also argue that role overload and conflicts over the division of labor may be expressed in terms of unhappiness with home cleanliness. Using 1975 and 1995 national probability samples, we find, unexpectedly, that women in 1995 report similar attitudes about housecleaning as women in 1975, though there is some evidence that cultural standards have declined. We do find that marriage, motherhood, and employment predict lower satisfaction with home cleanliness. Key Words: attitudes, cleaning, equity, housework, trends. Housework is popularly characterized as tedious, boring, and unsatisfying labor, and those who do it have not been afforded high social status (Friedan, 1963; Hartmann, 1981). Indeed, its devaluation, along with its perception as "women's work," may explain why housework has been historically disregarded as a topic of sociological research. Fenstermaker (1996) notes: As "women's work"-something different from "real" work-any mention of it was relegated to discussions of the family-then the sole sociological province of women.... Even among sociologists who were interested in women's activities within the family, the unthinking exclusion of household work from the discipline meant that no one had taken a close look at the content, organization and structure of those activities. (p. 232) In recent years, however, there has been a proliferation of research on the organization, structure, and social meaning of housework, with notable volumes by Berk (1985) and Hochschild (1989). Research has been concentrated largely on the twin areas of the division of household labor and perceptions of its fairness. This has contributed to an understanding of the gendered aspects of housework, but also suggests somewhat puzzling findings. At the same time that women do the majority of household labor (even when employed full-time), they generally perceive little inequity or conflict with significant others about this work (Berk, 1985; Spitze, 1988). A central question that researchers pose about housework relates to equity outcomes-in particular, satisfaction with husbands' domestic contributions, given a gap between his and her inputs. We attempt to contribute to understanding equity issues within households by taking one step back and examining a central goal of doing housework-to produce a clean home. We argue that to better understand equity issues surrounding housework, the answer to a more basic question-"Is my home usually clean enough?"which is rarely discussed in the literature, should be considered. We examine two general hypotheses that may contribute to understanding how women's stresses and conflicts surrounding household labor may be channeled, given that research suggests women are not generally directing dissatisfaction with housework toward husbands (Pleck, 1985; Spitze, 1988). First, because neither husbands nor children have picked up the slack when women have become attached to the paid labor force in recent years, homes on average, are less likely to be consistently clean or kept up. Yet if standards for home cleanliness have changed, men's increased household labor becomes less important. In fact, there might be less dissatisfaction with the unequal division of labor than researchers expect. Ferree (1980) suggests that the collective cultural context in which women's paid and unpaid labor takes place has been relatively ignored. Changes in work roles and cultural norms in the past generation may have been accompanied by a psychic disinvestment in housecleaning, suggesting that women do not generally get distressed by husbands and children who do not pick up the slack. …

[1]  M. Rose Feeding the family , 1941 .

[2]  William J. Goode,et al.  A theory of role strain. , 1960 .

[3]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Multiple classification analysis , 1967 .

[4]  Lorenn Walker Homemaking Still Takes Time. , 1969 .

[5]  Joann Vanek,et al.  Time spent in housework. , 1974 .

[6]  Sarah Fenstermaker Berk,et al.  Household Work in the Suburbs , 1976 .

[7]  H. Hartmann The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle: The Example of Housework , 1981, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[8]  G. Spitze,et al.  Sex Stratification: Children, Housework, and Jobs , 1984 .

[9]  C. Berheide,et al.  Women's Work in the Home , 1984 .

[10]  Sarah Fenstermaker Berk The gender factory , 1985 .

[11]  Joseph H. Pleck,et al.  Working wives, working husbands , 1986 .

[12]  S. Sudman,et al.  Time, Goods, and Well-Being , 1985 .

[13]  B. Bergmann,et al.  The economic emergence of women , 1986 .

[14]  S. Shaw Gender Differences in the Definition and Perception of Household Labor. , 1988 .

[15]  G. Spitze Women's Employment and Family Relations: A Review. , 1988 .

[16]  Scott Coltrane Household Labor and the Routine Production of Gender , 1989 .

[17]  A. Hochschild,et al.  The Second Shift , 1989 .

[18]  B. A. Shelton The Distribution of Household Tasks , 1990 .

[19]  M. M. Ferree Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research. , 1990 .

[20]  Linda Thompson,et al.  Family Work , 1991 .

[21]  M. M. Ferree The Gender Division of Labor in Two-Earner Marriages , 1991 .

[22]  April A. Brayfield Employment resources and housework in Canada. , 1992 .

[23]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  THIRD-PERSON EFFECT RESEARCH 1983–1992: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS , 1993 .

[24]  Laura Sanchez WOMEN'S POWER AND THE GENDERED DIVISION OF DOMESTIC LABOR IN THE THIRD WORLD , 1993 .

[25]  J. Brines,et al.  Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  M. Lennon,et al.  Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: The Importance of Options , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  S. South,et al.  Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households , 1994 .

[28]  E. Kane,et al.  Family Status and Criticism of Gender Inequality at Home and at Work , 1994 .

[29]  Laura Sanchez Gender, Labor Allocations, and the Psychology of Entitlement within the Home , 1994 .

[30]  April A. Brayfield Juggling jobs and kids: The impact of employment schedules on fathers' caring for children. , 1995 .

[31]  John P. Robinson Time, housework, and the rest of life , 1996 .

[32]  Scott Coltrane,et al.  Entitlement, Obligation, and Gratitude in Family Work , 1996 .

[33]  H. Perkins,et al.  GENDER AND FAMILY EFFECTS ON THE “SECOND-SHIFT” DOMESTIC ACTIVITY OF COLLEGE-EDUCATED YOUNG ADULTS , 1996 .

[34]  Beth Anne Shelton,et al.  The Division of Household Labor. , 1996 .

[35]  Sarah Fenstermaker The dynamics of time use: Context and meaning , 1996 .

[36]  T. Greenstein Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality , 1996 .