Is the three-foot bicycle passing law working in Baltimore, Maryland?

Maryland (MD) recently became one of fourteen states in the United States to enact a traffic law requiring motor vehicles to pass bicyclists at a distance of greater than three feet. To our knowledge, motorist compliance with the law has never been assessed. This study measured the distance between overtaking motor vehicles and cyclists [e.g. vehicle passing distance (VPD)], to develop baseline metrics for tracking implementation of the three-foot passing law in Baltimore, MD and to assess risk factors for dangerous passes. During September and October 2011, cyclists (n=5) measured VPD using a previously published video technique (Parkin and Meyers, 2010). Cyclists logged a total of 10.8h of video footage and 586 vehicle passes on 34 bicycle commuting trips. The average trip lasted 19.5±4.9 min and cyclists were passed on average 17.2±11.8 times per trip. VPDs of three feet or less were common when cycling in standard lanes (17%; 78 of 451 passes) and lanes with a shared lane marking (e.g. sharrows) (23%; 11 of 47 passes). No passes of three feet or less occurred in bicycle lanes (0 of 88 passes). A multiple linear regression model was created, which explained 26% of the variability in VPD. Significant model variables were lane width, bicycle infrastructure, cyclist identity, and street identity. Interventions, such as driver education, signage, enforcement, and bicycle infrastructure changes are needed to influence driving behavior in Baltimore to increase motorist compliance with the three-foot law.

[1]  Tetsuya Mizoue,et al.  Effect of the Physical Activities in Leisure Time and Commuting to Work on Mental Health , 2007, Journal of occupational health.

[2]  A M Khan,et al.  Bicycle use of highway shoulders , 1995 .

[3]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .

[4]  D. Rojas-Rueda,et al.  The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  John Parkin,et al.  The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  H. Nijland,et al.  Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[8]  I. Vuori,et al.  Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[9]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Bicyclists' Response to Urban Bikeways , 1976 .

[10]  Kathryn M. Parker,et al.  Installation of bicycle lanes and increased ridership in an urban, mixed-income setting in New Orleans, Louisiana. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[11]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[12]  J. Parkin,et al.  Barriers to cycling: an exploration of quantitative analyses , 2007 .

[13]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles at signalized intersections. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Jane C. Stutts,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES , 1999 .

[15]  Ian Walker,et al.  Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Melvin R. Ramey,et al.  Effects of Bike Lanes on Driver and Bicyclist Behavior , 1977 .

[17]  L Herrstedt,et al.  SAFETY OF CYCLISTS IN URBAN AREAS. DANISH EXPERIENCE , 1994 .

[18]  David L Harkey,et al.  Evaluation of Shared-Use Facilities for Bicycles and Motor Vehicles , 1997 .

[19]  Jane C. Stutts,et al.  Bicycle Crash Types: A 1990's Informational Guide , 1997 .